this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
-5 points (30.8% liked)

SimulationTheory

108 readers
2 users here now

A place for serious discussion of simulation theory.

Rules:

  1. No hate speech.
  2. Treat others with respect, no matter your agreement or disagreement.
  3. No low quality participation.
  4. Posts must clearly tie in with simulation theory or a submission statement must be added to explain the relevance to the topic.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
kromem@lemmy.world
-5
Scientist suggests gravity further supports theory we are living in a simulated universe (www.port.ac.uk)
submitted 2 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/simulationtheory@lemmy.world
0 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Vopson's latest contribution.

I'm not much of a fan and think his interpretation seems backwards (gravity as best modeled by a continuous substrate seems more likely to be original whereas quantum/discrete units more likely secondary), and would think behaviors like observable limits past density thresholds (black hole event horizons) or frame rate adjustments near the same (i.e. time dillation) or local information speed bottlenecks (i.e. gravitational wave max speeds) would all be more where 'simulation' artifacts might be.

But still. On topic.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here