this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
-25 points (25.5% liked)

Open Source

38620 readers
620 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I need whoever wrote that readme to have a piano fall on them cartoon style.

[–] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

You're just not looking close enough at your Digital Horizon.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 7 points 2 months ago

Companies like OpenAI built "Super AI"

Let me stop you right there. No they didn't, and at this rate they never will. What we have is shit "AI", and if your solution to that builds on more shit "AI", you'll end up with a Jurassic Park sized midden.

Everything past that first false premise is best read as satire.

[–] dabati8@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago
[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Functionality-wise, its a promising 'personality' training system. Could be my 'guiding voice' when my other agents run autonomously for longer time. Could also be used to create Agents imitating the thinking of some Hooman experts we want to influence some agent sub-system we have, or just creating a domain-expert AI.

However, it have the option to connect to a seemingly(?) closed-source 'AI network', where people can buy services, create NFT's on personalities and similar market garbage, so I won't be using that part - open or not.