Maybe, but its still odd how they use this fake explosion transition effect between each clip. Usually these clips just end abruptly, but with this one they wanted to make it look fancy i guess. It unnecessarily makes the entire video look very fake.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think the drones flew out there on a rapid collision course to deliver a warm cup of coffee...

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those explosions are definitely not real if thats what you are implying.
When a kamikaze drone explodes, the video of the explosion itself never makes it off the device, because the entire drone will be dust before the processor has even dealt with a single frame of the footage capturing the explosion.

The cut off is just exceptionally early in this video, thats all i was wondering about.

This video looks like visible+infrared so its different from the usual.
But even then, the editing usually looks more like this post by you: https://sopuli.xyz/post/21099327
No weird added visual or sounds effects.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah of course, I don't think anyone thinks those explosions are the ones from the drones.

The early cut off of video is because of the standard Russian anti drone signal jammers.

Unless there's a cutaway to video from a faraway monitoring drone, you don't get to see the actual explosion, which usually just looks like a puff of smoke.