this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1225 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

11574 readers
684 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, it's probably not safe in a crash at highway speeds (if it can even reach those speeds), but then neither are motorbikes and we allow those...

It's got to be better for the environment and wallet than those stupid Ford monster trucks. Especially since these would only attract people who actually need to carry large amounts of stuff about, rather than those who once needed to transport a fridge four years ago.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (12 children)

They do ok against regular sized cars, just yours are insanely big.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] groet@feddit.org 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those huge trucks are also not save in any crash. At least for the other person.

Any crash involving an "american sized" car will be worse than two of these small trucks coliding

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Getting hit by one of those trucks at 30 MPH has as much force as a Honda civic at 55 MPH.

Fuck modern pickups.

[–] ammonium@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

A Honda civic weights ~1100kg. The kinetic energy of a vehicle is proportional to v^2^. Therefore, a vehicle going at 30MPH delivering the same kinetic energy as a Honda civic at 130MPH needs to weigh in at 130^2^/30^2^*1100kg or 20tons. Modern American trucks are too big and heavy but not that big and heavy I think

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

A fully loaded truck could exceed 10k vs a Honda at 3k. Math shows 55 mph for the Honda. A far cry from 130 mph

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

Probably not on interstates. But for most roads it ought to be okay.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 105 points 1 day ago (16 children)

We citizens need to change the laws to highly tax those oversized vehicles. And we should make them commercial use only. Average people don't need huge trucks. K-cars are quite cool.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately taxes are kinda the reason why we see so many oversized trucks on the market and the reason you don't see any small trucks anymore. It's a result of manufacturers and lobbyists gamifying the EPA regulations that came out like 10-15 years ago.

Basically trucks under a certain weight have to meet a certain mpg standard otherwise they'd be taxed at a higher rate. However, there was a bypass for heavier "super-duty" trucks, so now most every truck being sold is classified as a super-duty which were originally meant to encompass "working" trucks meant to haul things like equipment.

It's really just another symptom of our government being a joke and the result of regulatory capture.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

They're "light" trucks under CAFE standards as opposed to real trucks like semis and utility trucks. If they were smaller I think they would be lumped in with all the other normal passenger vehicles.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is a reason the guy in the article bought a 1990. The US has a 25 year rule for importing vehicles that weren’t sold here. These became legal in Utah a few years ago because they made off road side by sides legal as long as you made some modifications (horn, turn signals, mirrors, etc). There’s a particular weight range they need to fall between. They also have to hold the same insurance requirements and registration as any other road vehicle. I don’t think they can be used on any road above 45.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›