I really like my PS5, but I see no value in a model costing 80% more and being only current for half a generation.
All that for an "up to" 40% performance increase.
I don't care how much of a graphics nerd someone is, that just isn't worth it.
I really like my PS5, but I see no value in a model costing 80% more and being only current for half a generation.
All that for an "up to" 40% performance increase.
I don't care how much of a graphics nerd someone is, that just isn't worth it.
The dollar ain't buying what it used to either.
Also, remember that our prices include VAT, so we slap 20% on it right there. That £700 is £583 excluding the VAT.
That's still 10% more than in the US doing a direct currency conversion, but it's not quite as bad as it first looks.
Still a lot of money for a games console though, especially a mid gen refresh. Paying at the start of a gen for 8 years gaming ain't too bad when you look at it per year. PS5 Pro will be over 4 years, and on that alone is piss-poor value.
My TV from 2017 was HDR, so it was. But HDR monitors would have been pretty rare, so the bug probably wouldn't have shown up in any great numbers.
I don't even run Windows in HDR mode (because it looks awful), but it picks it up anyway and completely fucks the graphics up.
Damn, those Taylor Swift fans got real mad real fast.
I mean, a pound don't buy what it used to. We've had rampant inflation, and it's going to be hard to keep any next gen console in a price point that we think of as suitable. I mean, this is the first gen where the price has gone up during it. PS2 slim went down to under £100 by the end. I paid about £80 for a GameCube late in the gen. I remember Xbox having to give money back to people because they launched at about 300 and Sony immediately went down to £199. It was carnage.
£299 felt like a standard price point for ages. My Amiga 1200 cost about that in the early 90s, and I paid the same for a PS2 nearly 10 years later, and the Xbox 360 was about the same.
£700 feels like a piss take though, and the sales figures will surely reflect that. PS6 has got to be under £600 I reckon, and we're probably about 5 years away from that.
Load times have always been bottlenecked by the CPU, so it's not a massive surprise that the SSD is about on par with a decent SD card.
On the PS4 an SSD was faster than a HDD, but not by a massive amount. At least it was quieter though.
It was MS that started that back on the OG Xbox.
I think all the F2P ones (and a handful of others like FFXIV) are exempt from it. At least on Playstation.
Oh it's made plenty for Nvidia.
I think the best thing about this gen is running those slightly too ambitious PS4 games at 60fps.
It's so nice to get a rerun of the Nazis for those that missed it the first time round.
I find it hilarious that anybody would go on stage and endorse political candidate who has never met them.
Might as well have just said "I'm hoping to sell my music to racists and establish myself as 'one of the good ones'".
It might do now. They've done a lot of improvements.
Even on PS5 it was an absolute mess in co-op. 30fps (if you were lucky) all round, constant freezes (several seconds) when swapping characters, many many crashes. Whenever we told it to save, we'd have to both touch nothing to make sure it didn't crash while saving. Oh, and there was a bug meaning only the player who chose to sleep for the day would get any companion progression.