this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
585 points (100.0% liked)

196

18057 readers
984 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Or, ya know, maybe just the result of metabolic acidosis from kidney disease, kidney failure or untreated diabetes.

Yeah but that's not as marketable.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So bro was sitting in this chair butt ass naked to where their skin was making direct contact like that? They better hope he got raptured cause that's so much less embarrassing. I can just hear the Shlick of the leather as it clings to their sweaty, acidosis riddled skin.

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Acidic sweat could slowly leech the tanning chemicals from the leather. Him or her being naked isn't necessary. More likely to happen somewhere warm and humid, though. Probably the US southeast, like Louisiana, Florida, or similar.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

As much as I want this to be true, someone said it's most likely just the tar and chemicals from a heavy smoker which darkened a light chair but your idea is cooler.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Damn, must have been a smoker.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 34 points 2 years ago

“We’re anti-science, but this is the chair our son was sitting in when he spontaneously combusted. Price firm.”

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Really, it's a light colored chair discolored by smoking everywhere but where it was covered.

[–] StraySojourner@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That foot rest looks so uncomfortable

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think someone might have died in that chair.

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That would still be the case if the post was true

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Not if he was raptured while still living!

"Two men walking up a hill, one disappears, and one's left standing still. I wish we'd aaaall beeeen reeeeady."

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 years ago

Rapture happened but it ended up being only one guy.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 years ago

I like the presumption that everyone in this conversation is post rapture, and that we all gotta come to terms with plan B.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are they implying that being raptured would somehow leave that image on the chair? Because that doesn't make sense even given how silly the idea of the rapture is.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the reality where people can be raptured, what is logically incoherent about rapture causing slight discoloration of furniture? For me, if there’s difficulty in suspension of disbelief, it’s in the former part, not the latter.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because rapturing doesn't stain leather. It's just a ridiculous notion.

[–] GrimSheeper@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a licensed rapturologist I can verify that rapture events do leave stains on organic material. It's the same miraculo-chemical process that burns Jesus' face into the toast of true believers.

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Evidence: Shroud of Turin

Checkmate Atheists

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Unironically this is a pretty good piece of "evidence" - don't get me wrong rapturing isn't real, but we're talking about internal consistency here, not reality - if rapturing is real, then the Shroud of Turin is real, which means that the marks left on it must be typical for divine dissappearing acts 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the Shroud was genuine, someone from the UK would have put baked beans on it.

Checkmate, theists

[–] bremen15@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's a joke about how religious people keep claiming to see Jesus' face on toast and how baked beans on toast is the UK equivalent of a PB&J sandwich

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 years ago

Why not? It’s like saying, “Witches don’t exist, but if they did, it’s ridiculous to think that they can make love potions.” I would even go so far as to say leaving “shadows” behind is a standard part of rapture lore.

I guess I’m just a lot less confident about how rapture physics works than some folks.

[–] RedStrider@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

im dead 💀

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Get tons of money from Christians with this one easy trick!