this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

Space

1288 readers
58 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What exactly are they cooling this with, because there just isnt enough atmosphere in space to vent into.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago

I'd guess they'll just have big ass black body radiators oriented away from the sun.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

With the will of the people... Jk, but good question.

[–] Denalduh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if they're going to harness the temperatures of space itself to keep it cooled

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Space is technically cold, but only because the density of atmosphere is near zero. That means there are no molecules to absorb the heat like it would be not-in-space, so overheating is more of a problem because heat lost to radiation is slower.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I never really considered that. A heatsink in vacuum wouldn't work very well at all. Thanks for making me think.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So bigger heatsink on the far side of the moon?

[–] Securus777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Bigger heatsink would be the target, but you gotta get it up there. On moon is not a half bad idea. Bury the heatsink and use the moon itself might be the best idea, depending on how quickly it can absorb then dissipate the heat through the righlith. The side of the moon doesn't matter as there isn't an actual 'dark side' of the moon, just a side we can't see do to tidal locking. That side still gets the same amount of sun.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something something Skynet.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Two questions:

  1. Why?

The satellites are part of ADA Space’s “Star Compute” program and the first of what it calls the “Three-Body Computing Constellation,”

  1. Why that name? I've read that book series and I'm now concerned.