VOLUNTEER firefighter? That sounds like woke socialist bullshit to me, should've smited him instead. /s
People Twitter
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
volunteer firefighter
computer, zoom in and enhance
woke socialist antifa parasite
Looks like a vomit ear fryerbrain
I would expect nothing less from a god who sells power ups for the low cost of human sacrificing your daughter.
?
Ops referencing the Bible.
Where does the Bible prescribe that you sacrifice your daughter for power ups?
Genesis. It's all about descendants of Adam and eve trading their daughters for the promise of becoming a great nation, or land, or farm animals, or wives. It's weird. Basically men have authority over everything and make deals with God sacrificing others for their own wellbeing.
🤨
Isn't that just how pre modern society worked? People commonly just married off their daughters to other people until the past few centuries
Can't be God's hand. It's lacking the nail holes. Must be the devil's.
I may not be the most religiously knowledgeable person on the planet.... But didn't Jesus get the Home Depot special, not god?
I don't know about other religions, but we were taught as youngsters in Catholicism that Jesus was god too. They were separate, but one. 🤷
Every religion invented it's own version of the mythology.
Yep, the ultimate hero's journey.
Jesus is God. He isn't God The Father, but God The Father doesn't have a physical/earthly form, so it can't be His hand.
Yeah, that makes sense. / S
Would make less sense if The Creator of the Universe wasn't able to manifest Himself as a human
Wrists would have the nail holes. Hands can't support a human hanging on a cross. But I understand your point!
Yes, but what's amusing to me is that this painting shows the wrist but not the palm.
Wrists are still visible, the term I was using "hand" in this context actually can refer to the upper forearm, it's just me using theological terms, my bad lol.
Although also in my defence, a hand was what's painted, the wrist is visible, so it's still okay to refer to what's shown as a "hand"
Lets just be real here. We only want one hole in a body part, and it's not the being on the left!