this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

Tree Huggers

755 readers
46 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archived (Wayback Machine)

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_S_B@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Eh compared to some other projects this is much milder. I mean there is a project that has been gaining strength that will explore oil right in the amazon basin and that will be a disaster if even a drop of oil spills.

Also upon the completion of the Chancay there is the possibility of trucks doing the same trajectory but with more pollution.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 hours ago

This will probably be less destructive than a road or a mining project, but if this increases trade with China, then it increases the profit incentive for production of all of those deforestation-linked commodities that are produced in the Amazon and Cerrado biomes, and possibly in the Atlantic Forest as well. The main problem is therefore not the destruction caused by the railway itself but by the production of the things that it transports.

Another (potential) problem with this railway is that it creates a new profit incentive for deforestation. If speculators buy land in key locations along the railway and deforest it in anticipation of the demand for a settlement or trading hub, the damage is done, even if nothing is ever built there. Better than the semi-permanent destruction of having a town or road or mining project or cow pasture there, and maybe it won't happen at all, but it still isn't exactly good news. If the railway were replacing a road network which would be closed off and allowed to reforest itself, then that would be progress.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The latest route follows existing highways in southern Acre, avoiding Indigenous territories and more intact forests.

“Railways cause less impacts than highways. And from the little we know so far, it will not go through any Indigenous territories,” Ivaneide Bandeira, coordinator of the Kanindé Association, a nonprofit organization in Rondônia state, told Mongabay in an audio message. But construction and resulting agricultural expansion may cause negative impacts, she added.

[–] jenni007@lemm.ee 0 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

I dont't think people realize the importance of the amazon. We will pay for this generationally one way or another. Sad.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 hours ago