this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
217 points (100.0% liked)

196

17958 readers
492 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

from the early 18th century

h/t to @jetton@mastodon.online

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At least this idiot had the excuse of historical linguistics being so underdeveloped; it's understandable he'd think language was immutable... but he's still a total idiot who apparently thought God spoke English in the Bible instead of Latin and Hebrew.

[–] prayer@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

God spoke Aramaic to Paul and wrote in Hebrew to Moses. I don't think he thought of God speaking English in the Bible, rather than English was invented by God and man "ought not corrupt God's language."

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 7 points 2 years ago

These are people who insist that the KJV, perhaps history's absolute worst translation of scripture ever, as the single solitary legitimate version of the Bible.

[–] mashbooq@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Conservatives are so dramatic, Jesus

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder if there were 18th century shitposters who turned this into copypasta but subbed in "s" and "ſ" in place of "you" and "thou"

[–] snorkbubs@fedia.io 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ye olde shitte transcribers

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wish whatever jackaſs that decided that the long ſ needed a ſtupid nub at exactly the ſame poſition as the croſsbar of the letter f in Roman typefaces a very unpleaſant afterlife. As if OCRing hiſtorical documents didn't have enough problems already.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

I imagine romans had a lot of bitching about pronouns back in the day. Mostly because bitching about pronouns is an important part of learning Latin over a thousand years later. Like seriously use whatever pronouns you want, but there’s such a thing as too many and that fucking language has too many

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

Wow, he foundf ferioif

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

fenflefs. Why use the weird s (f) when they have the normal s

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

English has never not been jank af

[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

they also say fpeaking and spirits, so maybe they were pronounced different

[–] z500@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The f-like letter is the form they used inside of a word, and it's actually called long s: ſ. Short s was used at the end of a word and after a long s.

[–] N0body@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

Thou art a grammar Prussian, good sir.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

Pure, plain, and single language of T R U T H

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is the source for this? I feel strong tshirt potential

[–] Z3R0C00l@artemis.camp 5 points 2 years ago

I have a shorter version. LMAO

[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Neat, I did not know that. I was just trying to make a funny since it looked like it said "oof-ed by GOD". Thanks for sharing!

[–] nyhetsjunkie@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

That a halluva moufull.

[–] emerald@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Something about the typeface made me read this with a lisp