120
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Jesus learn the lesson from Afghanistan. No one in the middle east wants america to bring its brand of freedom.

You don't want to be the police of the world. Fine. Then stop fucking it up for everyone else.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The Republican Party: Isolationists who love going to war.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

They can't contain their hate, and must take it out on someone. The most convenient political target. And to think, Iran was as peaceful as ever just a few years ago under the nuclear agreement, but US GOP (and Israel) could not accept it. Now Iran is blatantly helping Hamas and Putin terrorists, with no hope of diplomatic relations. I'm sure this will end well.

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's politics 101 when you are unpopular to create an enemy for the public to hate. This distracts the population from at home issues under the guise of coming together in unity.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yes. It's tragic that so many humans are this gullible, even without learning about politics, to not notice obvious patterns, and accept that they're being manipulated. And then, when an actual threat emerges, not even being able to recognize it.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Or, learn our lesson from 1979 in Iran.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 32 points 1 year ago

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) went even further, tying together Hamas, Hezbollah, and the militias in Iraq and Syria to draw the conclusion that “you have to cut off the head of the snake and the head of the snake is Iran and not simply their proxies.” There couldn’t, he suggested, be any diplomatic settlement with them—ever. “As President of the United States,” he said, “my foreign policy will be simple, you cannot negotiate with evil, you have to destroy it.”

Literal warmonger.

And they want to invade Mexico? These people are murderous.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every time I hear a Republican say they'd love to invade us I keep chuckling because they don't realize the level of nationalism, pride and unity that we have. "México lindo y querido" is very much alive.

It may be a shit country but it's my shit country! (But tbh it's not that shitty and it does many things right.)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I've tried to explain that most Mexicans want to live in Mexico to conservatives more than once, but they're convinced that there are an infinite number of brown people and they all want to live in the U.S.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's definitely a weird one given the economic situation. Many won't come back even if they parade in a charro outfit while they ride a horse and wave the Mexican flag in foreign soil. But I can confidently say that the great majority of Mexicans have a great regard for Mexico, to the point that they want their remains to be brought back and buried here when they die. lol

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 29 points 1 year ago

GOP Candidates Are Warming to the Idea of War With Iran

Then draft them.

[-] plz1@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

It must be so difficult for them to not be at war in the region for a whole two years. Ugh.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Just a reminder that Iran is probably a nuclear power by now.

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The scary thing is we're in a setup similar to Vietnam in Iraq. We could easily snowball the current presence there into a war. And for more fun we'd be fighting with the country borders while the enemy uses ethnic population borders. (We tried that in Afghanistan already)

[-] rezz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Meta comment, but I often click politics or other links from the local feed, and like 90% of articles are paywalled. These communities are useless with the volume of paywalled material.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I used to copy and paste the article text, but the instance admins no longer allow it.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Politicians including democrats have been “warming” to this for decades. Was it John Edwards who sang the bomb Iran song? Scary stuff.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

McCain. Of corse it was a republicunt.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That’s right. My bad. Thank you.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
120 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2320 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS