this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Geopolitics

443 readers
5 users here now

The study of how factors such as geography, economics, military capability and non-State actors affects the foreign policy of states.

All articles will require a short submission statement of 3-5 sentences.

Use the article title as the submission title. Do not editorialize the title or add your own commentary to the article title.

In this community we encourage long, in-depth submissions. Submissions should not be news articles that merely provide quick updates on current events; instead they should include background information and an explanation as to why the events they describe are occurring.

Submissions should not be about an individual country's domestic policies. Instead, they should be about relationships between different countries and/or relevant international organizations. Things like breakaway politics are permitted in this subreddit, as they are relevant to and could affect the geopolitical system.

Submissions are strongly encouraged to come from reputable sources. When posting from a lesser known source, please check whether the authors have some sort of qualification demonstrating they are knowledgeable of the subjects they discuss.

Sources that include (or solely contain) maps, statistics, or other multimedia (videos, interviews, primary sources, etc.) are permitted and even encouraged in this subreddit.

We encourage discussion and welcome anyone to pose hypotheses and ask questions. We allow self-posts.

We encourage comments to be cited.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Provoked is a masterclass in historical scholarship, offering a well researched, honest, and rigorous account of the origins of the Ukraine war. The book’s central thesis is that the West systematically provoked Russia into conflict through decades of duplicitous policymaking. Horton compiles a mountain of evidence to dismantle the simplistic “unprovoked aggression” narrative peddled by Western media and politicians.

The book’s main strength lies in its exhaustive use of primary sources to trace NATO’s broken promises to Russia. While many are vaguely aware of the infamous 1990 Baker-Gorbachev exchange (where the U.S. secretary of state vowed NATO would not expand “one inch eastward”), Horton unearths dozens of similar assurances from Western leaders. For instance, he cites West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher’s 1990 press conference with James Baker, where both men declared NATO had “no intention to extend… towards the East,” a pledge repeated to Soviet officials by British Prime Minister John Major and German diplomat Jürgen Chrobog. Even U.S. State Department officials, like Raymond Seitz, affirmed in internal meetings that NATO would not exploit Soviet withdrawal from Eastern Europe.

Yet as Horton reveals, Western leaders were already scheming to expand NATO even as these promises were made. By 1991, NATO’s Rome Summit laid the groundwork for enlargement, and by 1992, U.S. strategists openly pursued expansion to cement “Euro-American hegemony.” This pattern of deception of NATO methodically breaching assurances to Russia forms the book’s core narrative. Horton argues that Western elites, driven by hubris and short-term gains, ignored Russia’s legitimate security concerns, treating it not as a defeated rival to be contained.

It's worth noting that Horton, being a libertarian, does not romanticize Russia, and he condemns 2022 invasion as a strategic blunder. His aim isn't to justify Russian actions, but to show how NATO’s encroaching militarily, backing the 2014 Maidan coup, and dismissing diplomacy by Western leaders fostered the very aggression they now decry.

I highly recommend the book as a resource for understanding the background behind the conflict.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here