I could never stop singing yt-dlp's praises. Absolutely life-changing software
Linux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
I wish my own alternative would get similar praises, because it was there when YouTube-dl wasn’t. I’m really bad at marketing, it seems.
294 Github stars, I guess your marketing is fine
Dont give up on it! Its very feasible that yt starts attacking yt-dlp. Invidious is already obfuscated. The more alternatives the better.
Very informative
Contributions which improve the documentation are appreciated.
Some love to you too
{PRAISES!}
Thanks!
I make a point of always being on the lookout for different versions or offerings exactly because its so debillitating to me when I lose the use of a tool I rely on. Keep on fighting the good fight. I remember how much it sucked when I ProTube stopped working and Ivory stopped working, those were both bad times for me
It seem to be really interesting! I will give it a try.
Feedback and patches welcome!
True! yt-dlp is the best.
Cool stuff, thank you for sharing your project with the community ! It's very cool and useful for people who just want a set and forget situation !
I stoped using yt-dlp frontends the moment I saw youtube actually serving upscaled opus media files (very visible line on a spectrogram). Also their metadata is totally fucked-up and not very well organized and full of shit (comments with huge spaces and non useful metadata...).
Sure, the metadata part is easily fixable with Picard MusicBrainz, but the quality downgrade was a huge no for me. Nowadays, I use nicotine, rutracker and private trackers to download FLAC quality files and transcode them to opus 192k to serve them in my Navidrome library with a well curated metadata structure !
Yes it takes way more time and some dedication but it's worth it :) specially If you are some kind of perfectionist and like everything neatly organized ! 😁
More power to you for keeping the opensource community thriving !! Thank you !
Thanks for the nice comment! I'm actually planning to maybe integrate the Picard metadata into my music downloader. It is still a plan though. I have no working prototype yet.
I stoped using yt-dlp frontends the moment I saw youtube actually serving upscaled opus media files (very visible line on a spectrogram). Also their metadata is totally fucked-up and not very well organized and full of shit (comments with huge spaces and non useful metadata...).
Wow really? Are you sure it applies to all audio files? YouTube gathers music records from different companies so they could be of varying quality. To me the opus quality from YouTube was always decent and personally I cannot hear any compression in the audio. The metada is not perfect, but I usually use some tag editor to complete what's missing. YTDLnis on Android does a great job of scraping as much usable metada from YouTube Music as possible.
Not sure if every audio file is upscaled, however I had a few files who clearly were 128kbs mp3 upscaled to ~192kbs opus !
personally I cannot hear any compression in the audio.
100% agree on that xD !! However, I'm some kind of strange audio freak hoarder. If the spectogram of an audio doesn't reflect my standards (not upsacles audio files...) I won't keep/archive it !
Do note that I didn't used a paid YouTube account... Maybe they don't serve HQ audio files to free users? Dunno, but after some digging into the spectograms I was not happy seeing how bad they looked !
Will check this out, thanks.
I hope you will have a fun time with it!
cool stuff, man. Thanks for sharing
Thank you!!!
Very interesting! Sounds useful.
Thank you!
Please log in to prove you're not a bot
I can't help that I was born a bot, you bigot.