4

Hello, I was trying to configure i3 to match the functionality of vim (i3 uses jkl; because h is mapped to horizontal split), but when I was doing it I was wondering what the reason is behind every vim or vim-like editor using hjkl. It's rather inefficient to have to move your index finger to the h key every time you want to move left. I know that the creator of vi had his hjkl keys mapped to arrow keys, but why hasn't this changed. Is it a historical thing, or is there an actual logical reason.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nemith@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

This is the terminal that was used by the creator of vi, Bill Joy.

It should be obvious on why those keys were used. They weren’t “mapped” they literally were the arrow keys. It’s hard to change defaults. Anyone who knows vi keybinding and install work on vim or any other system.

It would be easy for you to change your own keybindings. Why is there a need to change everyone’s default and break existing muscle memory.

https://vintagecomputer.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/LSI-ADM3A-full-keyboard.jpg

I don't really think it's much of a problem that h isn't on a touch typing key because you don't need to press h very often. I probably use : way more than h. (: requiring shift isn't ideal though, although that's another can of worms)

[-] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

Most Vim users use j and k more often than h and l (because there are many more ways to move horizontally), so it makes sense to leave them to the strongest fingers.

[-] technom@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

That would be a bad design, IMO. The index finger has 2 keys to manage, of which one needs its lateral extension. Though the pinky is weaker, the semicolon is in its resting position.

The actual answer though, is Bill Joy's keyboard. Another commenter has explained it.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)

Neovim

2161 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS