this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
25 points (90.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4197 readers
248 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What happened to these ships in 2025? Why did they only keep the midget version?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They cancelled 1, scrapped 2, are "refitting" one and using one.

Kirov/Ushakov had a "reactor incident" on its 2nd deployment, and since it was 1990, the Naval budget was some large negative number and it was never fixed.

Frunze/Lazarev sailed to the Pacific Fleet, then spent 5 years sailing around their home water, 7 years doing nothing, 6 years fueled in dock and 15 years as a rusting hulk before being scrapped. Again, no money.

Kalinin/Nakhimov actually did stuff until 1997 and has spent every single day since then "undergoing refit". It will return to service next year in the same way Elon Musk is going to Mars next year.

Andropov/Pyotr Veliki is actually in active service in the Northern fleet, actually goes on long trips and does exercises, like a normal ship does. It only got declared a deathtrap unfit for use once, in 2004, and seems to be doing OK now. It's massively outdated though, and is said to be withdrawn when Nakhimov is finished refitting (so never)

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you for the information!