this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
245 points (88.2% liked)

Technology

71717 readers
4288 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A growing network of online communities known collectively as the “manosphere” is emerging as a serious threat to gender equality, as toxic digital spaces increasingly influence real-world attitudes, behaviours, and policies, the UN agency dedicated to ending gender discrimination has warned.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 67 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

Why are they called unwomen?

Edit: ffs. I need to get off the phone and drink my coffee. United Nations Women. Third shift is killing me.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 12 hours ago

I haven't laughed this hard in a long time, thank you

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (40 children)

Bill maher touched on this last night on his show, and i cant believe im seeing more of it.

He argued men are shat on far to often in todays media with female leads taking more lead roles.

He also brought up countless movies starting in the 80s that pushed the dumb dad/male narrative that persists today.

Does he have a point? Yeah idk really.

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

Pretty much. Misandry feeds misoginy and viceversa, if you don't temper your discourse and make it reasonable someone else will come and make you temper it

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 19 hours ago (16 children)

Am I tripping, out of touch with reality? These people really don't seem to understand the problem and that makes me seriously question their methodology.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The manosphere is easy to understand. People hate doing work and taking accountability. So just blame the problems on someone else, and watch my podcast and buy my shit.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 35 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The manosphere is one symptom of a much larger problem. Look at it in isolation and you’ll miss the big picture. Authoritarianism is on the rise globally. Loneliness is reaching epidemic proportions. Society’s traditional institutions are a distant memory. All we have remaining are loose groups of people shouting at each other as the spectre of war lurks in the background.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

But the manosphere doesn't need to be a symptom of those problems. That's a choice.

Another choice could be that men band together to identify the real problems and address those.

For example. In the manosphere, women are considered gold diggers. Well, because of the patriarchy, men are told that it is their job to provide, and that their value is tied to how well they provide. So you have men who think it's their job to provide money, and then are complaining when women see them as a source of money. This is stupid. Men could stop trying to be providers, and instead try being people who are interesting to talk to and nice to be around. That would solve both the golddigger problem and the loneliness problem. It would also start to address some of the capitalist problems, where people are willing to self-exploit, just to get a little more money than their neighbor.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, it is a choice. However one of the biggest problems is that so many of the good choices are gone. I’m talking about the positive social institutions and community organizations people used to belong to. The third spaces.

Communities have fragmented. Neighbours hate each other. Both of my neighbours hate our family. One is a childless, alcoholic husband and wife who also hate each other (they used to be nice years ago) who also hate us and give us creepy looks all the time. The other is green lawn-obsessed neighbour who hates us for the pine trees we have growing on our property and refuse to cut down (at our own expense) to suit their tastes.

We’re a society of severely mentally ill, isolated, confused, and angry people. Our villages and communities are all gone. We’re all a bunch of islands unto ourselves.

I like saying that society is a hot gas.

It is a mass of small particles that barely interact with one another, heated up by the heat of anger and hate, floating in a large space aimlessly.

My type of society would be a liquid, where particles are free to move but close to other particles.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago

Indeed. Capitalism breeds this crap by focusing on competition excessively and creating an environment where it’s almost mandatory to participate. People need to be looking to exploit people at all times and that is a deflating concept for people.

People also need to go offline. The apps have been taken over by scammers and bots. It’s time to flush again. Which is also related to capitalism.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] sem@lemmy.ml 44 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

According to the Movember Foundation, a leading men’s health organization and partner of UN Women, two-thirds of young men regularly engage with masculinity influencers online.

While some content offers genuine support, much of it promotes extreme language and sexist ideology, reinforcing the idea that men are victims of feminism and modern social change.

So, 2/3 of young men are risking to become incels, right? Because it is hard to imagine a young girl who is looking for a partner with hyperfocus on his own masculinity as well as a partner, who portraits himself as victim? That is sad...

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

Masculine influencer. Another masculine influencer. Not going for "male influencer" here that's just the top of my head list of people who a) happen to end up in my youtube feed and b) look really cool to pubescent boys. Silverback energy: Big, strong, just, kind.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

That statistics is bullshit that would be 66% of all young men

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 9 hours ago

It depends how broad their "masculine influencer" definition is...

I think whether it actually matters would depend more on if they're consuming "masculine influencer" content exclusively , without any concept of other world views.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, so you can see how that would be a problem

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›