Some was 16mm but probably mostly shot straight to vhs:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096657/technical/?ref_=tt_spec_sm
And the bbc was notoriously bad at not losing archival footage of tv shows
Some was 16mm but probably mostly shot straight to vhs:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096657/technical/?ref_=tt_spec_sm
And the bbc was notoriously bad at not losing archival footage of tv shows
Cocker retriever
But you'd need a higher velocity to orbit closer...
Why would you need to entirely cancel the earths orbital velocity, surely you just need to cancel a ~~tiny~~ bit of orbital velocity?
Edit: https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/43913/do-you-need-0-km-s-velocity-to-crash-into-the-sun
You watched starship troopers and sided with the humans... Oh wait...
Edited the price to something more nvidiaish:
Reminds me of how I made tic tac toe game for my first university assignment 🤣
Everything is better when it ends with a fact check.
Sometimes a fresh pair of eyes on a code base can reveal some opportunities for big improvements in maintainability 😜
Yeah I'm not saying they didn't edit it, but rather the master footage they were editing was on vhs or similar. I guess it's probably quite likely they would've had some sort of better quality magnetic tape rather than vhs come to think of it though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯