this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
752 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

71922 readers
4585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The revived No JS Club celebrates websites that don't use Javascript, the powerful but sometimes overused code that's been bloating the web and crashing tabs since 1995. The No CSS Club goes a step further and forbids even a scrap of styling beyond the browser defaults. And there is even the No HTML Club, where you're not even allowed to use HTML. Plain text websites!

The modern web is the pure incarnation of evil. When Satan has a 1v1 with his manager, he confers with the modern web. If Satan is Sauron, then the modern web is Melkor [1]. Every horror that you can imagine is because of the modern web. Modern web is not an existential risk (X-risk), but is an astronomic suffering risk (S-risk) [2]. It is the duty of each and every man, woman, and child to revolt against it. If you're not working on returning civilization to ooga-booga, you're a bad person.

A compromise with the clubs is called for. A hypertext brutalism that uses the raw materials of the web to functional, honest ends while allowing web technologies to support clarity, legibility and accessibility. Compare this notion to the web brutalism of recent times, which started off in similar vein but soon became a self-subverting aesthetic: sites using 2.4MB frameworks to add text-shadow: 40px 40px 0px hotpink to 400kb Helvetica webfonts that were already on your computer.

I also like the idea of implementing "hypotext" as an inversion of hypertext. This would somehow avoid the failure modes of extending the structure of text by failing in other ways that are more fun. But I'm in two minds about whether that would be just a toy (e.g. references banished to metadata, i.e. footnotes are the hypertext) or something more conceptual that uses references to collapse the structure of text rather than extend it (e.g. links are includes and going near them spaghettifies your brain). The term is already in use in a structuralist sense, which is to say there are 2 million words of French I have to read first if I want to get away with any of this.

Republished Under Creative Commons Terms. Boing Boing Original Article.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 7 points 10 hours ago

Just to mention it:

gopher://sdf.org

There is no better place for plain and real content

[–] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

That is made by someone who had a Geocities website, or went 1000% in on MySpace back in the day.

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 5 points 13 hours ago

I guess all that's left is to form a no-utf club.

[–] alansuspect@aussie.zone 7 points 16 hours ago

JavaScript, the powerful but sometimes overused code

now there's an understatement.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That is just stupid. How about a slighly more complex markdown.

What I really want is a P2P archive of all the relevant news articles of the last decades in markdown like in firefox "reader view". And some super advanced LLM powered text compression so you can easily store a copy of 20% of them on your PC to share P2P.

Much of the information on the internet could vanish within months if we face some global economic crisis.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

And some super advanced LLM powered text compression so you can easily store a copy of 20% of them on your PC to share P2P.

Nothing can be that advanced and zstd is good enough.

The idea is cool. With pure p2p exchange being a fallback, and something like trackers in bittorrent being the main center to yield nodes per space (suppose, there's more than one such archive you'd want to replicate) and per partition (if it's too big, then maybe it would make sense, but then some of what I wrote further should be reconsidered).

The problem of torrents and other stuff is that people only store what's interesting to them.

If you have to store one humongous archive, and be able to efficiently search it, and avoid losing pieces - then, I think, you need partitioned roughly equal distribution of it over nodes.

The space of keys (suppose it's hashes of blocks of the whole) is partitioned by prefix so that a node would store equal amount of blocks of every prefix. And first of all the values closest to the node's identifier (a bit like in Kademlia) should be stored of those under that space. OK, I'm thinking the first sentence of this paragraph might even be unneeded.

The data itself should probably be in some supercool format where you don't need to have it all to decompress only the small part you need, just the beginning with the dictionary and some interval.

There should also be, as a separate functionality of this system, search by keywords inside intervals, so that search would yield intervals where a certain keyword is encountered. With nodes indexing continuous intervals they can decompress and responding to search requests by those keywords. Ideally a single block should be possible to decompress having the dictionary. I suppose I should do my reading on compression algorithms and formats.

Probably search function could also involve returning Google-like context. Depending on the space needed.

Would also need some way to reward contribution, that is, to pay a node owner for storing and serving blocks.

[–] lmr0x61@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I host my own website, and I decided to rewrite the JS portions in React, in order to learn the framework. Boy was it a learning experience: To do the same thing required 2-4 times the amount of code—and that’s just in the scripts, let alone the all the bloat from the packages and the bundler.

I know this is a bit more radical than cutting out frameworks, but working with the JS ecosystem was such a pain, largely because there’s you need to piece together different software to make a stack work, which may or may not go together well. And since your stack is likely unique, good luck getting help on your problems. It made me miss Rust (albeit most languages do)—in Rust, you have Cargo for everything, and it’s beautiful. Rust has its own difficulties, but they actually feel surmountable compared to the dependency hell of JS.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

React is probably overkill for most simple sites. You could still use JavaScript for some cool stuff without needing all the libraries and frameworks

[–] x0x7@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

The dependency hell of JS is caused by React. It's an ironic turn because node gained popularity in part because it was one of the first to have a coupled package manager with a massive public contribution model, full of a billion packages that follow the unix philosophy of "everything should do only one thing, and do it well" Dependency hell would disappear if people stopped popularizing competing swiss army knives. It's made worse by people trying to mash these swiss army knives together just to improve portfolio.

We've gotten to the point where you aren't considered a real professional unless you start even the smallest projects with maximum technical debt.

It should never be impressive that you used a tool. If the tool made programming it easier then it's not a mental feat. If the tool made programming it harder, then people should think you are kind of slow for using a tool that made development harder. This is why brag culture over what tools are used makes no sense. Just use tools that make life easier. If it doesn't make life easier, stop using it.

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

We’ve gotten to the point where you aren’t considered a real professional unless you start even the smallest projects with maximum technical debt.

They're just following the example laid out by the venture capital model, really.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I'll say one thing for the No CSS philosophy - at least it eliminates light-colored text on a light-colored background using the thinnest possible font, which is probably the stupidest stylistic trend since the web began.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

I remember the wonderful feeling when Discord had a redesign in like 2017 or 2018 where they undid that awful gray-on-white design trend and made the text actually have contrast. These days the annoying trendy design thing is articles/blogs with extremely narrow width.

no i do not want to read paragraphs
that are this wide. this is making it
way more annoying to read. please
stop doing this.

at least Firefox has Reader Mode.

[–] x0x7@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In the future there will be media queries for how old the reader is.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Will teenagers with shitty vision be able to get away with lying about their age or will there be verification?

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Get this bs outta here. I write on paper! No one knows my thoughts or feelings!!

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

What devilry is this? Written word? Real cultures use oral history to store knowledge!

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Or hieroglyphs, to stay on the sane side.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Passing information between two simultaneously existing entities? Get outta here! All cultures use the Jung collective unconscious to store knowledge!

[–] impshum@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

WORDS???? The cheek of it!

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thoughts in a contiguous sequence??!!? What utter bloat! Why even have a past or future when a pure consciousness need only experience the horizon of an infinite present.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

Ⰰ⭕☣╛⊄ⴓ⬤⡥◻ⶠ≣ℙ⡥≾⚽⡳↍ⴖ≋ℒ⊴⎟⼑⋪‡⛘⩎??!!? ⓿⑍▆╟❵! ▧⟺⛴∎Ⳗ⭥♟↠⤢⮪ⱎ⧏ⲇ⃲⿁⌔⋓!!

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh neat! I'm working on a forum that doesn't use any javascript

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

No, it's my own that I'm building from Scratch. It's C#/Asp.Net Razor Pages. Plain CSS on the frontend, no javascript

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (7 children)

What we need is a subset of modern web, without any bloat, especially JS frameworks.

A lot of websites can be static HTML + CSS.

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Maybe a little JS, as a treat?

It's fun for hiding little easter eggs.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The subset exists. What you're referring to is an agreement or convention.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just out of curiosity what percentage of people here are using Voyager as their Lemmy client?

Spoiler

Voyager wouldn’t work without JavaScript… shhh don’t tell anyone

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ththat's different.. you take it back!!

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

There are so many people here that hate cloud based services. And the same people also hate JavaScript. Like you realize if your app was just static JavaScript files, you could literally just download the entire site to your computer and run it? Why is JavaScript the enemy?

JavaScript isn’t the enemy. The enshitification of technology is the enemy.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 56 points 1 day ago (11 children)

"No HTML club" is kinda going too far on the Web. If you go there you might as well start a No HTTP Club and serve stuff over Gopher and FTP.

But we definitely need an HTML 2.0 Club.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›