this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
752 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

71922 readers
4585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The revived No JS Club celebrates websites that don't use Javascript, the powerful but sometimes overused code that's been bloating the web and crashing tabs since 1995. The No CSS Club goes a step further and forbids even a scrap of styling beyond the browser defaults. And there is even the No HTML Club, where you're not even allowed to use HTML. Plain text websites!

The modern web is the pure incarnation of evil. When Satan has a 1v1 with his manager, he confers with the modern web. If Satan is Sauron, then the modern web is Melkor [1]. Every horror that you can imagine is because of the modern web. Modern web is not an existential risk (X-risk), but is an astronomic suffering risk (S-risk) [2]. It is the duty of each and every man, woman, and child to revolt against it. If you're not working on returning civilization to ooga-booga, you're a bad person.

A compromise with the clubs is called for. A hypertext brutalism that uses the raw materials of the web to functional, honest ends while allowing web technologies to support clarity, legibility and accessibility. Compare this notion to the web brutalism of recent times, which started off in similar vein but soon became a self-subverting aesthetic: sites using 2.4MB frameworks to add text-shadow: 40px 40px 0px hotpink to 400kb Helvetica webfonts that were already on your computer.

I also like the idea of implementing "hypotext" as an inversion of hypertext. This would somehow avoid the failure modes of extending the structure of text by failing in other ways that are more fun. But I'm in two minds about whether that would be just a toy (e.g. references banished to metadata, i.e. footnotes are the hypertext) or something more conceptual that uses references to collapse the structure of text rather than extend it (e.g. links are includes and going near them spaghettifies your brain). The term is already in use in a structuralist sense, which is to say there are 2 million words of French I have to read first if I want to get away with any of this.

Republished Under Creative Commons Terms. Boing Boing Original Article.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 179 points 1 day ago (1 children)

JavaScript, AJAX, and modern web frameworks have pushed us away from displaying information in a pure and clean way. We need to go back to a better time!

Looks at no-HTML websites

Shit, we've gone back too far!

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 78 points 1 day ago (34 children)

CSS on the other hand is quite essential to separate layout from content. Which is a good thing, so I can't really think of a reason for a "no-CSS" rule. Specifically if you can use inline styles as well but in a way more messy way.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I know that's what CSS is supposed to do, but I'm not sure many people use it that way.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can get behind no JS club, I can’t get behind no CSS club.

CSS is 🆒

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A subset of css is cool, but man does it go too far.

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but you can’t be tracked via css so it’s okay in my book. Have fun with your whacky css sites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 22 points 1 day ago

Pfff, that's nothing. My club doesn't even have a website.

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I rather have these people embrace gopher

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago

Let's not. It's a terrible protocol with amateur design errors.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe we could have No-JS and No-Client-Storage (which would include cookies) headers added to HTTP. Browsers could potentially display an icon showing this to users on the address bar.

Theoretically, browsers could even stop from the JS engine from being started for the site in the first place. Though I wouldn't be surprised if the engine is too tied into the code of modern browsers for that to work.

[–] snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

A Content-Security-Policy with script-src 'none' should already allow for that . no js can be loaded like that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Just earlier I was reading about this website hosted on solar power and the extremes they went through to get the website to be simple so very little data is transmitted to save precious watts.

The website https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about/the-solar-website/

it also matters because the complexity of websites is a burden to end-user devices. especially on weak smartphones, as i'm using rn, the power usage of heavy websites sucks a lot, as it considerably slows down the device overall.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oakward@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You are using ASCII? Weak. True website surfers use raw character values, like The Matrix in 1999.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

(ó﹏ò。) oh no my internet cred

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 2 points 23 hours ago

ASCII?! Useless, modern witchcraft! Devils work! Give me CCITT-1 or give me death!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How do you use hyperlinks without HTML?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Banthex@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Jesus. This is getting out of hand.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I photocopied my screen (those all in one printers are heavy) and I cannot find the glue little help?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Forces one to avoid deep links and parameter crap. I'm sorta two minds about this.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (16 children)

I do wonder if we're going to see some websites popping up that kind of hit the reset button on social media and go back to smaller communities of folks with something in common.

I kind of miss the days of actually having online conversations with folks you know are real people (not bots), that aren't trying to be an influencer, or get famous, or some how many money off your interactions.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No HTML should rather do all-Commonmark instead, imo. Background color and text width & stuff should not be your (the creators) business but my (the users) business only. But some basic styling is nice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›