this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39492 readers
341 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 17 points 1 week ago

I said in a previous article that this is great, but we should be adopting JPEG-XL as it is current and can now compress pixel-perfect / lossless images better than old PNG. IIRC this revision of the spec doesn’t improve compression yet but it’s coming.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not seeing how this would affect uptake. Lossless is great for production images, but standard JPEG will do (at low compression) for most Web use cases. Until OS developers coalesce around PNG as a standard (Windows has for screenshots), this is that old standards xkcd.

Alpha channels are nice and all, but how many end users A) have a need for that and B) understand the underlying concept, let alone implementation?

[–] fwygon@beehaw.org 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Alpha channels are critical. The ability to have images have transparency in them is much more useful than you believe it is. Many end users have a need for it, more than they know they do; so this argument really isn't doing much for your stance supporting PNG. Similarly PNG has supported alpha channels for quite a while.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For production, yes. What percentage of images produced are for production, though? I know damn well how important alpha channels are, but for posting something on social media, which is orders of magnitude more output than image creation within the context of a larger presentation, no one cares.

The vast majority of people aren't graphic artists. That you and I know what alpha channels are has no bearing on daily use by the masses.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

You are talking about photos. PNG is not the right format for photos.