this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025

225 points (96.7% liked)

World News

48035 readers

2309 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

225

‘The nurse told me I couldn’t keep my baby’: how a controversial Danish ‘parenting test’ separated a Greenlandic woman from her children (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 days ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/32448865

Miranda Bryant in Thisted
Sun 29 Jun 2025 07.00 EDT

all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 126 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

simply being Greenlandic will be enough to get the attention of social workers.

The tests cover attachment, personality traits, cognitive abilities and psychopathology, and take about 15-20 hours. It is almost impossible to pass them, says Nellemann; even he and his colleagues have failed to do so.

I remember reading about this late last year, and I remember not trusting that social worker or the process one bit.
I once watched a documentary about this kind of "social service" and some of their methods are 100% unscientific, and don't take personality traits or just moods into account, like whether a person is extro- or introvert. I even posted about it on feddit.dk, but was met with much skepticism. One of the things I saw, was that if a baby doesn't seek eye contact with a stranger holding it, it should be a sign that the mother doesn't give the baby enough attention! Yes really it's that stupid! When obviously it's more likely the baby doesn't appreciate a stranger.

I can't put into words how much I despise that kind of quackery! Because that's what it is.
But quackery is unfortunately standard procedure in social services. And social services even trump real doctors, meaning quackery trumps real doctors by law!!
Quackery is illegal in Denmark, except in social services where it's an everyday phenomenon.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 43 points 2 days ago

It’s worth copying that whole section, rather than just the first sentence. This shit is horrific and blatantly racist

The tests cover attachment, personality traits, cognitive abilities and psychopathology, and take about 15-20 hours. It is almost impossible to pass them, says Nellemann; even he and his colleagues have failed to do so. Questions can include “What is glass made of?” and “What is the name of the big staircase in Rome?” Nellemann argues that the tests are culturally specific and a poor way to measure innate intelligence. “There is a lot of stigmatisation of people from Greenland,” he says. “We don’t know why we should use these tests for parenting.”

When Keira was given the test, for Zammi, she says she was told it was to see if she was ‘civilised enough’

He even goes so far as to compare the tests to a tool of fascism. “You take only one kind of people as the ‘real’ ones. We only choose the white, or ‘real’, Danish people.”

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

One of the things I saw, was that if a baby doesn’t seek eye contact with a stranger holding it, it should be a sign that the mother doesn’t give the baby enough attention!

That's so messed up. Newborns are born with poor vision. "At birth, an infant is very sensitive to bright light. You may notice how small their pupils look, limiting how much light enters their eyes. A newborn baby can see something next to them with their peripheral (side) vision, but their central vision is still developing."

It takes time for their vision to develop. From that same source, "At about 1 month, your baby may focus briefly on you, but may still prefer brightly colored objects up to 3 feet away. Infants are able to see across a room even at birth, but they are mostly interested in objects very close to them."

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I haven't read the article yet (sneaking Lemmy time at work), but this reminds of the literacy tests they used to use for voting in the US for black folks

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Exactly what popped into my head too. They also had questions that were ambiguous. "What's the big staircase in Rome?" doesn't really have a single correct answer much like many of the literacy tests in the Jim Crow south.

[–] hr_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Because they are the same thing

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

France makes great use of quacks. Gordon Ramsey has some instructional videos.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Racist colonialist shit. They did the exact same thing to Inuit and First Nations women and babies here in Canada.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

After recoiling in horror and delving in, it does appear that they have stopped using this test as of January this year (search: Denmark FKU). I don't know if this woman has gotten her children back but its clear a lot of damage has been done already. Hardline institutional racism always make me wonder what is so upsetting as to justify such blind and heinous cruelties. It doesn't seem natural, to predate on your own species.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t know if this woman has gotten her children back

Probably not, the standard mode for social workers/services I've seen here in Denmark, is to double down, no matter how wrong their original decision was. It was their decision, and they are right by law, and it basically can't be questioned.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a Canadian, all I can say is "hey wait a minute, I've seen this one before!"

I'm shocked this sorta shit still happens in 2025, how did this come into being? Thus might be a rabbit hole I go down, who founded this program, who vetted it, etc

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We had this in Australia too :(

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago

We still do.

[–] TediousLength@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago

Absolutely disgusting... Completely biased and clearly racist test. Fucking fascists everywhere...

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

And here I thought the US was the one that treated our indigenous citizens like crap

[–] protist@mander.xyz 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You do realize the people doing that in the US all came from Europe

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Fair counterpoint. I should have but did not

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you don't really pay attention to the rest of world history, huh.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Jokes really do go over your heads down under don't they.

Also have you seen the tragedy that is the American school system? I am lucky I can read and write, forget knowing the history of a British penal colony.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Show me one place where indigenous people aren't treated like crap by the government

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago

Haiti. The indigenous people were wiped out through disease and slavery.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also good point. I guess New Zealand has been making strides by they are still having issues.

Just funny to note because a lot of Americans view Europe as like this Ultra free place that has none of the issues the US has.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

New Zealand recently just punished three politicians harshly for doing the Haka. They were protesting a proposed law to strip special constitutional privileges for the Maori stemming from the original colonial treaties. Those old British colonizers were apparently too respectful to the rights of the indigenous people for modern conservatives.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

I did say strides but having issues. At least they have indigenous representation. US def doesnt

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 5 points 2 days ago

We usually don't have these issues because we experimented away from home.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

White European indigenous people.

What a strange question.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, indigenous in this sort of context usually refers to a colonial state where the ruling group is different from the one there before a colonial empire got there. I don't usually see it used for populations that haven't been subject to conquest and occupation like that within the last millenia or so, even if it could technically fit, it'd be a bit redundant.

Though if the history of, say, Ireland is any indication, historically when white Europeans end up in that kind of position they haven't faired much better.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sorry, I was just being dense for the sake of it; and you of course, are correct.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Why not both (and many other countries too)?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

What's going on in Denmark?

https://sundayguardianlive.com/culture/single-mother-lost-children-denmark

https://sundayguardianlive.com/lifestyle/12753-tragic-tale-loss-world-s-happiest-country