this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
330 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

72894 readers
3552 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A robot trained on videos of surgeries performed a lengthy phase of a gallbladder removal without human help. The robot operated for the first time on a lifelike patient, and during the operation, responded to and learned from voice commands from the team—like a novice surgeon working with a mentor.

The robot performed unflappably across trials and with the expertise of a skilled human surgeon, even during unexpected scenarios typical in real life medical emergencies.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 113 points 1 week ago (6 children)

And then you‘re lying on the table. Unfortunately, your case is a little different than the standard surgery. Good luck.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 5 days ago

I assume my insides are pretty much like everyone else's. I feel like if there was that much of a complication it would have been pretty obvious before the procedure started.

"Hey this guy had two heads, I'm sure the AI will work it out."

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (10 children)

At some point in a not very distant future, you will probably be better off with the robot/AI. As it will have wider knowledge of how to handle fringe cases than a human surgeon.
We are not there yet, but maybe in 10 years or maybe 20?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'd bet on at least twenty years before it's in general use, since this is a radical change and it makes sense to be cautious about new technology in medicine. Initial clinical trials for some common, simple surgeries within ten years, though.

This is one of those cases where an algorithm carefully trained on only relevant data can have value. It isn't the same as feeding an LLM the unfiltered Internet and then expecting it to learn only from the non-crazy parts.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

This is one of those cases where an algorithm carefully trained on only relevant data can have value.

Hopefully more people learn that this is the important part.

It becomes nonsense when you just feed it everything and the kitchen sink. A well trained model works.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

it'll definitely get the greenlight in countries like China before anywhere in the west, I believe

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

realistic surgery

lifelike patient

I wonder how doctors could compare this simulation to a real surgery. I’m willing to bet it’s “realistic and lifelike” in the way a 4D movie is.

Biological creatures don’t follow perfect patterns you have all sorts of unexpected things happen. I was just reading an article about someone whose entire organs are mirrored from the average person.

Nothing about humans is “standard”.

[–] alleycat@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder how doctors could compare this simulation to a real surgery. I’m willing to bet it’s “realistic and lifelike” in the way a 4D movie is.

I think "lifelike" in this context means a dead human. The robot was originally trained on pigs.

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

The article mentions that previously they used pig cadavers with dyes and specially marked tissues to guide the robot. While it doesn't specify exactly what the "lifelike patient" is, to me the article reads like they're still using a pig cadaver just without those aids.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right I'm sure a bunch of arm chair docs on lemme are totally more knowledgeable and have more understanding of all this and their needed procedures than actual licensed doctors.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works -1 points 6 days ago

More than the doctors? No, absolutely not.

More than the bean counters who want to replace these doctors with unsupervised robots? I'm a lot more confident on that one.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

and since its been the way its been for awhile sugeons know more theoretically how to do surgery rather than practically so can't really take over.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Good, now add jailtime for the ceo if something goes wrong, then we'll have a very safe tech.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Inb4 someone added Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Saw to the training data.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

know what? let's just skip the middleman and have the CEO undergo the same operation. you know like the taser company that tasers their employees.

can't have trust in a product unless you use the product.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 5 days ago

Hey boss ready for your unnecessary heart transplant just to please some random guy on the internet?

Yeah so let's get this done I've got a meeting in 2 hours.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (4 children)

without human help

...

responded to and learned from voice commands from the team

🤨🤔

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

They should have specified "without physical human help."

load more comments (3 replies)

Oh good it’s voice controlled. Because that technology works amazingly all the time.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want that thing where a light "paints" over wounds and they heal.

[–] gezginorman@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

thank you for removing my gallbladder robot, but i had a brain tumor

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So are we fully abandoning reason based robots?

Is the future gonna just be things that guess but just keep getting better at guessing?

I’m disappointed in the future.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reasoning is just informed guessing.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

And that's all for analyzing statements. You can't just do that to some words and discover objective truth out of nowhere, so I'm not sure what you think you're accomplishing here. What you're linking is more analogous to the code that underlies an AI(if/while loops and whatnot). Reasoning is closer to the scientific method of forming a hypothesis and whatnot than anything you linked.

You basically just pointed out that there's a math system for logic. Neat.

load more comments (2 replies)

Really hope they tried it on a grape first at least.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Naturally as this kind of thing moves into use on actual people it will be used on the wealthiest and most connected among us in equal measure to us lowly plebs right.....right?

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you kidding!? It'll be rolled out to poor people first! (gotta iron out the last of the bugs somehow)

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You really don't understand modern medical bullshit. The rich will be all over this, just like AI, Just like NFTs just like every bullshit thing that comes up they get roped into by a flashy salesman

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I've been successfully propagandized into thinking rich people became rich through merit, I forgot how many of them are complete morons XD

Thanks for reminding me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

If we go by that logic, some worker from your supermarket should be able to do surgeries

Doctors have to learns this much so they can handle most really unusual stuff, not because they have to know this for a standard surgery.

How does the success rate compare

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

My son's surgeon told me about the evolution of one particular cardiac procedure. Most of the "good" doctors were laying many stitches in a tight fashion while the "lazy" doctors laid down fewer stitches a bit looser. Turns out that the patients of the "lazy" doctors had a better recovery rate so now that's the standard procedure.

Sometimes divergent behaviors can actually lead to better behavior. An AI surgeon that is "lazy" probably wouldn't exist and engineers would probably stamp out that behavior before it even got to the OR.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's just one case of professional laziness in an entire ocean of medical horror stories caused by the same.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›