this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
977 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

7774 readers
1594 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

see, shit like this is what ended up cementing my opinion as a commie. thats literally fucking awesome.

and its for once, actual communism being described by the chuds.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, communism is moneyless. No minimum wage in communism

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] darcranium123@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is why they figured out in Lakota culture many years ago that it's not safe to use sarcasm in your language. Some people might not get it and that makes them feel left out. Others may think dumb things are true so it can only make your whole culture dumber and unable to know what is true or misinformation. The entire sarcastic subtype of comedy is basically just not done, condoned, or laughed at which I think it's pretty awesome

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 5 points 6 days ago (18 children)

Why state owned grocery stores?

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Price gouging has been a major problem at Canadian grocers since COVID. Basically prices went up with supply chain issues / inflation but have not been adjusted for improvements in inflation since then.

These are for profit entities. They would steal a quarter from the poor and hungry if they could.

That's the fundamental flaw to capitalism - not that it concentrates wealth and power (because that is perhaps human nature) but that it celebrates it.

It conditions us to think that concentrating wealth is not only morally right but something we should all aspire to. That competing is morally superior to sharing.

Ultimately, if capitalists accrue so much wealth and power that they can buy out the interests that would seek to regulate them through democratic will, we then relinquish our democracy for feudalism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›