It’s no secret that New York City’s high density, extensive transit and excellent walkability are fundamental contributors to the lifestyle enjoyed by its citizens. However, as this study shows, these factors are also major contributors to their economic well-being. Because New Yorkers drive substantially less than the average American, they realize a staggering $19 billion in savings each year — money that their counterparts in other metro areas spend on auto-related expenses. And because they spend so much less on cars and gasoline—money that quickly leaves the local economy—New Yorkers have much more purchasing power to spend locally, stimulating the city’s economy. This is New York City’s Green Dividend.
The Green Dividend is a straightforward, even conservative calculation of the benefits New Yorkers enjoy from driving less. While the average resident of New York City drives about 9 miles per day, the average urban resident in the U.S. drives about 25 miles per day. At an average cost of vehicle operation of 40 cents per mile, this works out to $19 billion in annual savings for New York City residents.
Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for, but such studies are standard procedure for major infrastructure projects, at least where I'm from. Here's the 49-page executive summary for a new subway that's currently being built in my home town. It's obviously in German, but I guess the same should exist in English for any subway/tram etc. that has been built in the UK or any other English speaking country.
To give a brief summary of the summary: They've included all kinds of costs like
- accidents
- CO₂ emissions
- travel times
etc. and they come to a net-worth of 1.28 (later this was reduced to 1.23 due to unexpectedly high inflation in construction, but I don't know if they also recalculated the without-case after inflation), meaning every 1€ spent will generate 1.28€ in revenue/savings. Or a net gain of 39 Million Euros per year.
Thanks, something like this is indeed already interesting, especially with the return on investment calculation so I'll check it out. But to be slightly more directed at what I wanted, I meant a paper/article researching how much it would cost and it would save to have 90% of the trips in a society be with public transport. I understand if that is not something a lot of direct high-quality research has gone into.