172

Google is the master of fake Privacy features - gHacks Tech News (www.ghacks.net)

submitted 11 months ago by PoseidonsWake@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google started out with a "don't be evil" motto when it launched its first product, Google Search. Today, Google is a different company. It has created numerous products and abandoned a lot.

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 21 points 11 months ago

Yeah, it annoys me to no end. First, they tried to convince the industry that users don't want privacy, they want security, because somehow privacy would not be just one discipline underneath security.
And now that privacy has won, that even lawmakers have understood that it's something that users need and should be able to demand, now they're completely flipping their messaging on its head. Suddenly, they're all about privacy. Except, of course, that they're fucking lying.

[-] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago

The only solution is to break them up. There is no other way - Google will keep perverting and manipulating social trends as long as they're allowed to hold onto their position.

The web browser is the most important piece of software in the world. It should not be under the control of a single company - especially when that company is a massive monopolist with extreme conflicts of interest.

The web (and the entire internet) was built on standards. It is time to go back to multiple parties working together on standards. Not a single, monopolistic implementation.

(Google isn't the only company that needs to be broken up by the way, but they're definitely the most urgent.)

[+] mintycactus@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

[deleted]

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Well, with that proxying feature, I mostly meant that they're not doing it for the privacy, but rather for those other benefits.
Much like with 8.8.8.8 for DNS and AMP for the server-side, this feature locks down the client-side, ensuring that internet traffic goes over their infrastructure.

Yes, user privacy is short-term somewhat improved, because their competitors can't track you quite as easily anymore, but if they truly cared about improving privacy/security, there would be so many much lower hanging fruits they could pick, like end-to-end-encryption for Chrome Sync by default. They don't pick those, because it would impact their own ability to invade user privacy.

[-] ImTryingLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Take the IP Protection "feature". They hide your IP address from individual sites while hoovering up all of the user's data into their own servers, to use for their own ends.

Privacy hasn't been enhanced, if anything it's been weakened by giving one company a log of everything done through the browser. So, it's a fucking lie

[-] 314xel@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Github open issue if you want to chime in.

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Advertising is psychology, and Google is the biggest ad company. What do you expect?

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023

172 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

4027 readers

1 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

Be civil
No spam posting
Keep posts on-topic
No trolling

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

iopq@lemmy.world