this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Intel

177 readers
10 users here now

Intel Corporation is an American multinational corporation and technology company. Intel designs, manufactures and sells computer components and related products for business and consumer markets.

Intel supplies microprocessors for most manufacturers of computer systems, and is one of the developers of the x86 series of instruction sets found in most personal computers (PCs). It also manufactures chipsets, network interface controllers, flash memory, graphics processing units (GPUs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other devices related to communications and computing. Intel has a strong presence in the high-performance general-purpose and gaming PC market with its Intel Core line of CPUs, whose high-end models are among the fastest consumer CPUs, as well as its Intel Arc series of GPUs.


Icon attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

"We’ll get equity in return for it; get a good return for the American taxpayer, instead of just giving grants away"

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jonathan@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

gestures at butterfly

is this communism?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No, fascism also entails a merging of government and industry.

The similarity is part of what led to the term red fascism though.

Ultimately the difference is what purpose it serves and the integrity of the system involved.

With a federal government stripping all social aid and increasing the power of the security state it's very, very clear what the goal of this is.

[–] UpperBroccoli@feddit.org 7 points 5 days ago

So no more buying Intel CPUs, as if there hadn't been enough reasons already.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

As shitty as this admin is - that's actually the right approach. Companies want govt money? Sure. Print some equity.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The right approach would be to nationalize if you claim it has national security interests. Partial stake only incentivizes worst qualifies of capitalism.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

National security interests would drive the selection of certain companies. But all companies that need a bailout should do it in exchange for privileged stock. I'm tired of companies like ATT getting billions of dollars of free money for shit like "fiber infrastructure" and then just pocketting it. If they want that money, and if it is a matter of law, then they get uncle sam on the board telling them to spend it how it was meant to be spent.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

Bailouts are already conditional by law. Companies just break them and get fined cents for it. So clearly that's not the solution.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/loan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlling_interest

https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/intro-to-poli-sci/security-state

"Fascism is the merging of the state and corporate power" - either Mussolini or Gentile (in effect though the literal quote is disputed)

Some basics for you since you seem confused about intent and obvious results.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I have read much, much more than you on the topic, and the rest of their ideology amounts to it in fact if not exact phrasing.

Like, seriously, just think about "Everything within the state" which is certainly not a disputed quote for one goddamn second.

Further, you were quite literally too lazy to read the disclaimer in that very sentence so maybe just keep your ignorance to yourself.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Considering you made the claim of “Fascism is the merging of the state and corporate power”, I highly doubt you have actually read much about fascism, especially when the term for that is "corporatism".

And I would argue, if you claim that “Everything within the state” backs up your claim, demonstrates how little you actually understand of fascism and totalitarian constructs.

My point stands, you might wanna fact check yourself, because you clearly need to brush up on your poli-sci.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That is what fascism is or wants to do, dipshit.

Just lmao at the rest.

Have fun being a moron at other people.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That is what fascism is or wants to do

No, it isn't, in fascism corporations are nothing but the organizational structures for the members of the state to direct control.

The corporation is subservient to the ruling authoritarian, nothing more, any existence outside the totalitarian power structure is negated.

[–] hxlhxl@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago
[–] sith@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago
[–] hexdream@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The question is how bad this will be not just for future products, but existing ones.