And about a century later they are at home inside the White House.
Political Memes
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
Saw a similar thing in red dead redemption 2 but I tossed a Molotov.
I have a bit of respect for these people in the photo (not that much mind you) .... because they are actually showing their faces and let everyone know who they are.
Modern day white supremacists constantly have to hide their face and identity because they know what they are doing is wrong and won't be accepted by anyone.
Meh - "I hate illinois nazis" one of my favorite lines from the OG blues brothers, spoken while driving through a nazi march. You can hate them, as I do, but they have a right to demonstrate as much as you do - it does not equate with being unsafe. Yes, in 1926 the klan rallied. With the protections of our rights afforded by this country, they were allowed to do so. Do we all live under a Wolfenstein-esque KKK/Nazi regime now? No. All ideas can be expressed, you hope for the 'right' ones to stick.
Bro never heard of the concept of Defensive Democracy
Assumption is the mother of fuck ups.
You must not be a minority or have much empathy if you don't understand how a mass demonstration of the klan could make people feel unsafe
Hiding away the fascists doesn't make anyone safer. It just makes opposition to fascism seem like a less-pressing issue.
The Westboro Baptist Church's "God hates fags" campaign brought out millions of rainbow flags, and earned them no actual support.
The lesson to be learned from the Illinois Nazis, the KKK, the Westboro Baptists is not the paradox of intolerance. The proper lesson is "Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake".
The crimes committed in the name of its bigoted beliefs were despicable—hangings, floggings, mutilations, tarring and featherings, kidnappings, brandings by acid, along with a new intimidation tactic, cross-burnings. The Klan had become a clear threat to public safety and order.
An organized criminal syndicate “demonstrating” in Washington with impunity. Many members were police officers and government officials. I guess if you were white maybe you can afford this style of free speech. Today they’re embedded in ICE and kidnapping and disappearing people. People dying under mysterious circumstances in their custody. It’s good when they demonstrate unmasked so we know who they are. That’s the only benefit of this. Meanwhile people protesting genocide and protecting their neighbors are assaulted, jailed and drug through financial and professional ruin. But sure, it’s equal expression if you say so.
While you have a point about how the the 1st Amendment protects freedom of speech. And there are current day examples of the UK government deciding that people protesting against genocide are actually terrorists because of loose, arbitrary definitions. And further points could be made on how in an ideal world, the government should not be allowed to restrict speech.
There is also another point. This picture shows not simply a demonstration of free speech. It also shows a threat of violence and death at a time when this organization was very much involved in acts of violence and murder. Do we really think that the KKK should have the right to implicitly say that they will murder you? Or to have a show of force for how easy it would be for them to murder you?
Right now in the USA, you do not have the right to burn an Israeli flag. That is not considered free speech, it is considered hate speech. If protestors say genocide is bad, they can be arrested and maybe even charged with hate speech. But if the KKK were to march in DC again, there would be a police escort and reporters talking about the 1st Amendment.
Who watches the watchmen? Who determines which groups are marching for true expression and who are marching as a 'show of force for how easy it would be for them to murder you?' It's too much power to give to any group or body, hence why free speech and freedom of assembly is protected. Is it constantly challenged? Sure, another privelage of being an American. You can lobby congress that this damn rock and roll is corrupting the youth and needs to be censored. It doesn't mean you are right, no matter how 'virtuous' your cause.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall. This is the bedrock of our liberty.
If this is what you belive, then you should really be motivated to action by the fact that we aren't allowed to burn Israeli flags in the USA.
Also, what would constitute hate speech or a threat of violence?