Everyone sees that this is a slow walk coup, right?
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8369 readers
306 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Is it really a coup if they’re already in power? It’s a heavier grade of authoritarianism, but I don’t know if there is a single word that encapsulates it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-coup
A self-coup, also called an autocoup (from Spanish autogolpe) or coup from the top, is a form of coup d'état in which a political leader, having come to power through legal means, stays in power illegally through the actions of themselves or their supporters. The leader may dissolve or render powerless the national legislature and unlawfully assume extraordinary powers. Other measures may include annulling the constitution, suspending civil courts, and having the head of government assume dictatorial powers.
From 1946 to the beginning of 2021, an estimated 148 self-coup attempts took place, 110 in autocracies and 38 in democracies.
Yes, it's a coup to take over our democracy and go completely authoritarian. Kind of like Jan 6th, they were in power at the time.
I think Chicago gangs are better armed than the Guard. But also maybe smarter.
Cool, now the DC troops can keep standing around and doing nothing, but with badass guns.
Well, they also have them harassing houseless individuals. Trump has been using the poor as a way to desensitize people to armed troops in the streets, because I'm sure Miller is rock hard just thinking about rounding up everyone that:
-
didn't vote Trump
-
non-white
Saw video of him and Vance getting boo'd and you could just see his lust for bloodshed. And Trump is completely checked out at this point, because he just doesn't have enough neurons firing to do anything but cheat at golf.
If that is all they are doing, it’s to normalize their presence. Until it isn’t all they’re doing anymore.
There are legal safeguards: they need congressional approval to do this longer than 30 days. There are also political safeguards: not very many republican voters are buying the narrative that this is necessary, just like with LA.
Congressional approval is kind of a forgone conclusion at this point isn’t it?
I don’t trust any of the safeguards in place to hold. Some might. Some won’t. The ones that fail will be abused to a greater and greater extent as they test their limits.
This can be filibustered.
I love your optimism.
But at some point, you have to look around and say this isn’t business as usual anymore right?
Maybe we’re not there for you yet, but have you set up your own lines where you can say, once they’ve crossed that line, it’s not okay?
My lines were way back when he promised to chase down dangerous criminals, and they started rounding up day labourers. When they tried to pretend due process was unnecessary and undeserved by the people they didn’t like.
When they deployed military units in domestic cities under the completely bogus claims of emergencies.
Nothing they say is true, because the only thing they treat as true, is whatever is most expedient to them in any given moment.
There is no legal or traditional way of running the government that is safe from their perverting intentions.
Bring it on ass holes