this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)

Denver Post Comment Section

396 readers
42 users here now

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

Sometimes I think I have no life and spend too much time on my phone or whatever and then I see that people are upset about this and then I don’t feel as pathetic

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Much ado about nothing. Just more distraction generated by screaming from Fox News.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I swear, the white wing are some of the biggest fucking snowflakes on the planet. It's why we have this dumpster fire in the WH - they wanted him to lash out at every single thing they hate.

Even back when I was an omnivore, I didn't find the food there all that great. As a vegetarian, I don't think they have many options for me and so I've not even thought of stepping inside one in years.

I think they have much bigger problems than their logo. If you don't make veg-ns welcome, you have the veto effect in operation and you end up turning away more than "just" veg-ns...and restaurants have GOT to do a lot better than a poor attempt at a salad, or offering up a bunch of sides. Sorry, that's not enough to be treated like a goddamn afterthought.

https://plantbasedworldpulse.com/the-veto-vote-economy-why-dietary-diversity-is-now-a-business-imperative/

^ Cannot tell you how many times I or other plant-based eaters have turned down various options for not being good enough for us - and that sometimes includes groups with a large amount of people, including company outings. There might be 3 or 4 vegetarians or vegans in a group that has several dozen and everyone else is omnivore? But guess what, the omnivores aren't eating there, either! The veto vote is very much a thing and I've seen it in action for decades. I've seen some industry people instructing others in the industry that they need to heed this effect, but I still see plenty of restaurants either completely unaware of it or ignoring it outright.

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're right.

Also people need to relax, the same mediocre food will still be available at higher prices.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, not sure why these people act like their childhoods were ruined over....checks notes....a logo? WTAF. People need to get much thicker skins.

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Many years ago (like 20 maybe?) they were good and relatively cheap, but I haven't been to one in at least a year or two because their quality has been shit for so long...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

TBF, I might not have stepped into one since the late 90's, early 00s. I think part of it is that I've never really opted for such fare anyway. I don't really care for American food all that much when dining out, and Southern food is most especially not my thing.

The other thing was that when I was younger, I tended to think of Cracker Barrel (and quite a few other chains like Marie Callender's and Village Inn and probably many others I cannot think of right now but you get the drift) as where much older people tended to eat - I mean, "boomer" is now shorthand for "anyone older than 40" it seems, but I don't think I saw many boomers there - this was silent generation/greatest generation as far as I saw. And that's fine if that's what you like; it just didn't seem like something I was ever going to choose myself. Every time I've eaten at Cracker Barrel it was when someone many decades older than me had chosen it as part of a family outing.