this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

Stallman Was Right

1559 readers
2 users here now

Nobody listens to him. But he was right all along.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We desperately need a third option for phones. Apple is Apple, Google has more or less become Microsoft. We need a Linux variant for phones.

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Hopefully, this will push that, and maybe RISC becoming viable?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago

I don't know, the way things are going I see upstart manufacturers having enormous trouble with things like mobile carrier frequency licensing/access, as well as institutions blocking access (ie banking)

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Google play store showed an alert warning, before terminating the process: To install an app you coded yourself on your own device you need to renew your developer license regularly. /s?

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

oi mate! got a loicense for that ?

[–] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Is the title wrong? The way it's worded made me think the end user must have developer verification in order to side load "unverified" apps.But the article states:

only apps from developers that have undergone verification can be installed on certified Android devices starting in 2026.

Which means that they want "unverified" apps to be literally uninstallable.

How easy is it to enforce this? I don't know android specifics, but maybe f-droid (which compiles from source) will bypass this?

[–] anon5621@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

From what I understanding they want implement same thing as ios have u have temporalale/permanent certificate as developer to install something on phone otherwise u done