“would run counter to overwhelming precedent, depart from longstanding constitutional tradition, and offend the rule of law.”
This seems to be the only way the administration operates.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
“would run counter to overwhelming precedent, depart from longstanding constitutional tradition, and offend the rule of law.”
This seems to be the only way the administration operates.
Trump aims to offend. If you can be offended, he wants you to be. The rule of law in particular is no exception.
Trumpepstein and Republicans who support him sure love to waste taxpayer dollars on unreasonable litigation. Oh and waste on golf trips too.
Does it go to SCOTUS now? Because if it does all bets are off.
pretty sure this average Discord moderator getting to tell judges jack shit goes against the constitution but I know we're way past that by now