this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
373 points (94.5% liked)

Science Memes

16447 readers
3318 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Save power: imagine less boobs.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How much does it cost if οne person imagines it, generates an image, shares that, and 10k people see the image, and avoid imagining it?

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 hours ago

10k * 12 < 2 billion

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Must be nice, phantasiacs.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think I just burned a kilowatt of energy thanks to this meme. 🤤

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] four@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

No, they just imagined ~800 tits. Maybe even at once.

The image in the post also uses watts where watt-hours might be more applicable, so we are already more in the realm of memes than science

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hour…

You’re being very generous. 😅

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Kilowatt is not a unit of energy.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 53 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Watt isn not an energy unit.

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it's hours.

Either way, the numbers in this meme are clearly made up. Most image generation uses fewer than 10 watt hours.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

Can confirm. Image generation with SDXL Turbo uses approx. 0.4 wH.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago

People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it's hours.

This is new for me. Must be some engineering thing. I'm a physicist and and I feel guilty if I leave out some units just because, lol.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Its continuous to keep the image active in your mind :)

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 3 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

That'd need watt hours though. Meme is only showing the instantaneous power required to conjure the image for an infinitesimal amount of time - you cant do any useful 'work' with it unless the time is accounted for. Watt seconds maybe.

What makes me skeptikal of this data though is that the correct sciencing term for a billion watts is the well established 'jiggawatt'. In this context I'd have also accepted the Canadian spelling 'jigglewatt'.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yeah no. Imagine it like a computer and screen. To render an image it will momentarily consume a bit more power, but as soon as it has been rendered it will still continuosily consume a stable amount of x Watt to keep running and displaying the picture. For continuous stable operation of something with no specified time, Watt is the correct unit.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

not "infinitesimal time." continuously. think of it like this: to continuously think up perky tits, it takes a human mind 12 watts- brain is a 12 watt computer. time interval is proportional to the number of titty images/length of titty video. and im psure an individual instance of titty ai doesn't come out to 2.7 jigglewatts- im like 80% sure i can get a (small) titty generator to run on my lil 50 watt phone. not testing that assumption today tho.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Are watt seconds not joules

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 6 hours ago

yes, which is what you'd measure to compare the energy efficiency of completing a job.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

it’s about energy transfer though. transfer of titty whats to watts to my mind.

[–] HumanoidTyphoon@quokk.au 9 points 16 hours ago

That’s just science

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

And the text dosnt specify a time interval, whats your point?

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

That watts by themselves mean nothing with regard to energy consumption.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Also, it literally is an energy unit used in measurements. It's meant as a continious power. Ie. Your active imagination consumes around 12 watts of power, not "rendering one image"

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

That's power, not energy.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 7 points 15 hours ago

Watt would you suggest?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The AI provides exponentially better results, if you are me

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

skill issue

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Some of us have aphantasia. AI fat perky tits is an aid to the disabled.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world -3 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The brain is like a muscle. You can train it, even your phantasia.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Do you have any idea what aphantasia is?

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 hours ago

This is the stupidest thing i ever read. "I'm blind" - "just train your eyes"

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 9 points 15 hours ago

BI (biological intelligence) has luckily devised ways to get photographic replications of real fat perky tits through transformations of electromagnetic waves right to your retinas and thus into your brain. And it still takes less energy than AI.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 17 hours ago

No wait time either. I did it while reading the sentence.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 16 points 16 hours ago

I really enjoyed those fat perky tits thanks fossilesque

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 16 hours ago

I would have preferred a pic of the titties rather than a fibre optic brain.

load more comments
view more: next ›