this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
27 points (90.9% liked)

politics

25420 readers
2705 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An initiative aimed at boosting Democrats online offers influencers up to $8,000 a month to push the party line. All they have to do is keep it secret—and agree to restrictions on their content.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Right now Democrats (capital D, party Democrats) have a trust issue with their voter. And consistent with the most technocratic of approaches, they're convinced that its just "how" their message" is getting across, and not the content of the message itself or the integrity of the person delivering it.

I really wish I had more time, because there is a study to be done tracking Mandami's progress in this last election and his use of leftist media. Specifically, going on Hassan Piker when he was polling at 8%. Shows like The Majority Report, Bituation room, many others gave real time to Mandami and had him on. Democrats really, really hurt themselves between 2020-2024 where they basically abandoned attendance to leftist, online media (where it had propelled them 2016-2020. But this time, it broke through, and I think there is a key learning here: Democratic voters aren't getting their news from mainstream media any more.

And this is critical in the context of the above headline; online viewership in online media spaces, especially on the left, is dependent entirely on trust. Frankly, we've been burned too many times, so purity testing/ witch hunting here necessary is what keeps the media space in line. Its a necessary evil for qualifying as leftist media, that yes we're going to hold you to certain standards which, if you violate, we will burn you. This necessary filter has resulted in a better, more aligned, more quality media landscape.

So if any leftist media or media claiming leftism were to come in and start repeating capital D Democratic talking points, it would be the death of them. They would get burned so hard and fast its a conversation, not worth having, in practicality.

That being said, it won't stop astroturfing these messages, so keep you hackles raised.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 7 points 22 hours ago

It's always been amazing to me to watch the Democratic leadership complain about their "messaging problem", instead of trying to fix their "policy problem".

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Welcome to American politics.

How do you think clowns like Charlie Kirk or Ezra Klein have a job?

[–] Cybersec@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Hey I like Ezra.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

“If I want to work with another politician, I have to fully collaborate with them,” said one creator who was offered the contract but ultimately declined to take it and asked not to be named. “If I get Zohran and he wants to [do an] interview with me, I don’t want to give that to them.”

Creators in the program are not allowed to use any funds or resources that they receive as part of the program to make content that supports or opposes any political candidate or campaign without express authorization from Chorus in advance and in writing, per the contract.

The fact that anyone signed these contracts really shows that it's not new media that's game-changing on the left, it's the politics themselves. Even if the line was more thought out than, "Pokémon go to the polls" it'd still be vapid coming from someone who doesn't speak to the issues or wants to means test and austerity check the assistance to death.