this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
118 points (95.4% liked)

Fuck AI

4047 readers
1056 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Police were called to Dragon Con after an artist was accused of selling A.I.-generated artwork at their booth.
  • Vendor Oriana Gerez faced backlash and was asked to leave, sparking heated debate across social media platforms.
  • Dragon Con currently lacks a clear public policy addressing A.I. art in its Artist Alley or exhibition guidelines.
  • Controversy follows past A.I. art incidents, with the Dragon Awards and Fan Expo Canada grappling with similar issues.
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good. AI garbage does not belong in art spaces.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

Hurr durr but engineering prompts is an art!

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Shit clickbait. Police had nothing to do with AI and everything with that guy refusing to leave

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

But why were they asked to leave?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Meanwhile Dragon Con’s vendor area is still half “mystery boxes.” Not much moral high ground amongst whoever is divvying out vendor spaces.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What kind of stuff is in the boxes? Action figures?

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The stuff they couldn't sell the last few times before that.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Makes sense.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah and other collectibles. Think loot boxes in real life.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I bet the kids eat it up.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not art. AI doesn't create art. It generates images.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I call it “AI output.”

Art is something made by a person as a form of expression. AI output is just AI output.

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

They definitely seem to have real art on their site like the article says. I wonder if they had a mixture of things and rather than remove their AI generated stuff they fought with the management. Or they were just flat out asked to leave instead of given opportunity to fix it. I know a lot of traditional artists using AI now for posing and composition layout but they still do the panting etc. But it does look stifled sometimes. Like you can tell it’s been influenced by AI. It makes me sad. Especially since one of the artists used to be super fluid and expressive and now everything feels like they’re painting vectors :( which their merch distributor loves and encourages because it’s easier to print but I think it’s literally killed their business. I don’t think it’s “competitive” I think it’s convenient for a select few and killed their creativity. Fuck AI art.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

How do we know they sold AI generated images? Seems all the images on their site is hand made at least.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, throw him out, you also don't let people to run with cars on running competitions, so why would genAI art be better?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I am bothered by this. Has there been any confirmation that this vendor was trying to sell AI output rather than art, or was it just an accusation? I’ve seen too many witch hunts, false positives, and worse to blindly accept an AI accusation, and even the article doesn’t seem clear on it.