this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
540 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

74924 readers
3817 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 9 points 6 days ago

I still use a ten year old 1080p Sony TV, and I’ve yet to see a new <$1k TV with a nicer picture than what I have. Granted I don’t really consume any higher resolution content anyway 🤷‍♂️

[–] arararagi@ani.social 4 points 5 days ago

2tb drives aren't as cheap as I would hope

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

How about uncompressed 4k before going to even more compression 8k. I have seen uncompressed 8k content on an 8k TV. I couldn't tell the difference between it and a good quality 4k picture, and I'm admittedly a quality snob. I can tell the difference in 1080 vs 4k pretty easily even on cheap tvs, it's just virtually non existent at 8k vs 4k in tv sizes up to 80 inch beyond viewing inches away from the screen.

load more comments (3 replies)

probably because i dont even care about 1080p tvs. they all look the same.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'd buy a 8k TV, provided that it has no smarts, no WiFi, no TV tuner and its price isn't over 5% than a 4k TV

[–] bufalo1973@europe.pub 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I hear anything at or above 8k resolution negates the need for anti aliasing entirely... But I feel that my pc would would be running at or around 10-15 fps for most games I would care about anti aliasing on.

Nice in theory, definitely can't handle that many pixels in reality.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh but what if it was in 3D!

Remember that time?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 5 days ago

I want 8K TVs, but only when there's abundant native 8K content to watch on it - otherwise there is no point.

[–] harcesz@szmer.info 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, and 640kb RAM Ought to be Enough for Anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›