This article is reductive to the point of uselessness. By this logic, burning human bodies for steam power would count as solar because we are all star dust.
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
49 points (93.0% liked)
Green Energy
3328 readers
49 users here now
Everything about energy production and storage.
Related communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Given how much of our food is grown with fossile fuel made fertilizers, I would say burning humans is definitely not a renewable energy source 😅
Except for nuclear (fusion and fission) and geothermal, every form of energy comes from the sun eventually.
Fossil fuels used to be living forms, that got their energy from either other life forms or photosynthesis. Maybe geothermal for deep sea creatures.
And even fission and geothermal you could argue it's solar. Not from our sun, but from other stars, that formed the atoms. Both the radioactive ones and the ones that are hot inside the planet.
Yes, that is the point I was making.
Did you have any feedback on the rest of the article ?
Obvs we need to move towards renewable energy, but let's be specific about our terms: solar energy and wind energy are not the same thing. Both are renewable but no, wind is not solar, despite their argument that solar energy "causes" wind. It's a nitpick sure but a weird thing to state in the article.
Ya, by that logic oil is solar energy too because the ancient algae photosynthesized to grow before it died and was converted into oil. Ridiculous! Nuclear energy is solar because the uranium was formed in a supernova!
Ultimately every energy source is the product of solar energy, so might as well cut out the middleman.
It’s a nitpick sure but a weird thing to state in the article.
I agree with both points in this sentence. I appreciate your feedback. The author cold have elaborated on that point more but it's such a minor part of the article and I'm surprised to see people focusing only on that one line and some being outraged by it. That one line seems a bit negligible to the larger points presented in my opinion.
Oh agreed 100%, people tend to speak up more about a perceived error than the rest of the article they would otherwise agree with. It's like that meme about how it's easier to get a correct answer on the Internet by first posting an incorrect one, heh.
It's a bit disappointing to have this constructive conversation with you and then see what contradictory things you had to say in another community indirectly but you're certainly welcome to your opinions as is everyone else.
Sign in wall
Actually geothermal may give it a run for its money especially with the laser drills. Its sorta the ideal heating/cooling and baseload to pair with solar.
You know this is over blown since "only" is used. Sure important. Not only.
solar – including wind, which captures the sun’s energy through a different mechanism
This is the world's biggest reach...
For real. It's almost like saying this includes biomass generation too since that uses sunlight through photosynthesis.