this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
611 points (98.9% liked)

politics

25556 readers
3178 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] molestme247@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Um gee that's tough to figure out, I'm trying to spend my money wisely now, I'm an American and anything to stop giving it to a wealthy prick that only deserves a curb stomping. I haven't been to Walmart in a month now that's a new record for me. Trying in this economy is tough

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Reports out about how a new walmart in a region fucks the entire locality up in around 6 years. It's a good read. I can't find the article I read, but I think this is a good summary: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/walmart-effect.asp

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

theres an episode in the “99% Invisible” podcasts series on this case study. I think it was called “Food Deserts”.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been avoiding Catalan products for so long that checking the labels is second nature to me now. I simply added USA to the list. It's really easy to find alternatives or just not buy something.

[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yes, as in from Catalonia.

[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What is the issue? I am ootl

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's strong nationalist movement fighting for independence from Spain there. The nationalists took over the local government and a lot of local institutions (police, education, all sorts of associations and clubs). Fortunately so far they didn't resort to terrorism like the Basques before them but they are often violent and illegally financed (defrauding public money, Russia is also supporting them). They promote internal divisions, discriminate people who don't support independence and destabilize national politics. In the end it's all about money. They basically want fiscal privileges at the cost of rest of Spain. They use revenue generated by Catalan businesses as one of their arguments so the best thing you can do is to not let your money flow there.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand. Why boycotting then?

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Catalonia is a Spanish region, but there’s a movement that really wants the region to be independent. To basically become its own country.

There have been numerous referendums, protests and all manner of political intrigue.

Now, some people will of course be very much against this region separating from Spain for any number of reasons. It would create economic uncertainty, and adds new barriers. Even within the region not everyone is a fan of independence.

So yeah, that poster might feel particularly strongly about wanting to keep that region, or just a particular dislike for them.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yea I've read of that. It was actually Russian psyops that exacerbated the tensions, in a period where they were meddling in Britain for Brexit

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

FAFO.

Keep them elbows up!

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 16 points 2 days ago

So good to know all my efforts have not been in vain

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Tips fingers, excellent.

I can feel the alternate trade routes growing like the force spreading.

It gives me the warm and fuzzies knowing that in a few years people will be going states who and we are all consuming anything but american.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

gotta learn somehow

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Way to go, conservatives!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›