this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
387 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25567 readers
2590 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

"We'll show all those pointy headed smarty pants who's boss!! We're taking over!"

-- MAGA mouth breathers

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I didn't have this on my bingo card when i was growing up. I was told we were the science superpower and the best country in the world.

Now you realize they were all lies.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 48 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

And the NY Times helped. Carrying water for war criminals lost the dems the election. Heck of a job, NY Times.

[–] plant_sorceress_420@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

the dems are very capable of losing an election on their own

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

The paper of record.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

America is likely unique among superpowers, as it is INTENTIONALLY trying to commit suicide. Other empires throughout time died from disaster, neglect, and "fuck that guy", but never quite in this fashion.

America has no reasonable excuse for what it did to itself, and will be a case study for millennia to come.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's also speed running with destroying itself. Although the signs had been there for a few decades now, the way it went down with trump was just amazingly fast and interesting in a morbid way

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

It would be kinda neat if Summoning Salt did a mockumentary about the Trumpian Speedrun. Maybe in collaboration with BobbyBrocolli.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 9 points 17 hours ago

Millennia seems wildly optimistic on this trajectory

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

Guess we have to recommend kids who want to do real science in their future to learn Chinese or Korean.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

This story is brought to you by the NYT in more ways than one.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 day ago

A healthy, well educated population which feels safe and secure is incompatible with, and toxic to, conservative and authoritarian ideologies.

They need you to be sick, stupid, and scared.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think united states is envious of chairman Mao and wants to have their own cultural revolution too. Already had the military parade that outshone that of President Xi. Now have to outdo him in killing academics and intellectuals.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I think they view the downsides as temporary pain to achieve an end goal, which is an ethnostate for white people. Their philosophy hasn't been under the table at all, they say societies which benefit only one race (and obviously falsely, one set of beliefs), are better than those which have internal strife. All of this is laughable, since Israel has achieved as close to an ethnostate as we've seen, and yet they're unsustainable.

These people have failed upwards their entire lives, so they all feel confident that in the event of failure, they have the capital to smash and grab before the end using insider information. They're the worst humans on earth.

[–] squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 122 points 1 day ago (1 children)

After years of giving a platform to climate change denialism, transphobic fearmongering, pearl clutching over too much woke at liberal colleges, both-sideing the efficacy of vaccines and indulging in Covid conspiracy nonsense, the NYT has finally achieved its goal.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's time for America's Great Leap Forward.

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

What a perfect moment as we are at the edge of a cliff

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, but we got to own the libs. Are we not "great", again?

Also, outlets like the New York Fucking Times get to pretend to just float above it all, being "objective" in their reporting, because - say it with me - "both sides".

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We definitely are something again. The hate for the mere mention of "progressive" in this country is baffling. Like a toddler that doesn't want to grow up.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It's especially stupid because we tend to poll progressive on the issues. And yet we keep getting regressive policy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Yes we will destroy ourselves, but think of all the libs that will be owned!

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the country was colonized by religious nutjobs that didn't like the rise of intellectualism and enlightenment in Europe so this is rather more of a return to form.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That is a gross simplification. We're the first people here great people? Absolutely not! But to boil them down to one zinger is very dishonest, at best. And remind me what was going down in Europe around that time? Oh, the church was murdering people that didn't prescribe to their very specific belief structure, including scholars?

Here's some good key words for you to try searching the next time you're making shit up about that time period.

Hasbergs

Fredrick V

Matthias

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 19 hours ago

The "first people here" were the natives we massacred

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

To be fair the pilgrims were offered sanctuary in other countries first and then got mad that everyone wasn't exactly like them. That said a lot of the other initial colonizers were people being outright evicted from their home countries for non-religious reasons.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Hasbergs

Habsburgs?

Fredrick V

Who? There were lots of European monarchs of that name and number

Matthias

Who? It's a pretty common name.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You're right. They were also a bunch of genocidal hypocrites who, "believed all men were created equal" yet enslaved multiple continents while raping their way across it

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

who, "believed all men were created equal"

Who claimed to believe...

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 1 day ago

Its not in danger or peril, its already dead. China is already the leader.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (4 children)

White People Twitter is your citation? Social media was a mistake.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's probably true. Those tapes almost certainly exist and Putin has means to get them. But also, yeah, almost certain is not a fact. This is one of those cases where citing can only reduce the credibility of a statement by pretending there needs to be something more definitive than, "well, obviously."

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There were at least 3 beyond highly likely sources for the concealed tapes:

Seeing how Putin is very adept at working in shaded circles it's very reasonable to assume he now is in possession of a copy.
Not even unthinkable that epstein sold/gave putin a copy himself when he went there when Trump also had regular personal dealings in moscow.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

There's a much simpler way, Trump has been visiting Russia since the 80s. Their government could have just set it up when he was over there and filmed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›