Does anyone else detect the faint smell of GPT in this post, or am I just jumping at shadows again?
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
77 points (93.3% liked)
RetroGaming
24843 readers
163 users here now
Vintage gaming community.
Rules:
- Be kind.
- No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Jumping for sure. Sucks everyone is so paranoid these days, but it's also easy to understand why. Rest assured, everything on the site is written and edited by humans, and I wrote this post on Lemmy.
From what I can tell some key giveaways are excessive use of emdashes and emoji in lists. LinkedIn is a perfect example of everyone using AI.
But yeah, I recently launched my site in retaliation to all the slop out there (more about that here), as I'm just as sick of it as everyone else, maybe moreso because it's destroying the field I work in while decimating the careers of many friends and coworkers.
The only AI that touches the site is in place of stock photos and logos, and that's simply because the site isn't monetized and doesn't make any money. Me and the crew would rather put our focus into creating high-quality content, which means recording our own videos and taking our own images of products (we only review products we've actually hand tested), as well as writing our own words.
We don't want to regurgitate news in a rush like the slop shops; we have no interest in writing endless affiliated bullshit recommending products a writer has never used. We want to dig in and report the finer details, the stuff other sites won't cover because they think their audience are idiots that need everything dumbed down. And that's the point of opening an independent site, one owned by the writers; we are free to do the job as we see fit, and that means doing it with integrity.
Thanks for the candid reply.
I utterly despise that it's hard to tell the difference now.
Same, I feel ya, and like I said, can't blame ya. It's a real shitshow out there, hard to tell what is real anymore and what's bots.
Why use a FPGA? For the price of the chip (113€) you could get an entire SBC that has more storage, voltage regulation and protection, 3.3V or 5V IO and linux.
Then you're not in the target group.
Can someone explain to me who the target group is tho? I understand FPGAs have a larger potential of emulating hardware fast. But it's not like the chip designs for these old consoles are open source. So FPGAs are usually not cycle accurate either.
People who'd also by hardware by Analogue.
The same kind of pretentious person that says they can feel the difference of 1ms of input lag, or hear the difference between 320kbps audio and 1411kbps. You know, an elitist.
More seriously, people can still use their physical copies on a console that can easily connect to modern display technology. But at the same time, that physical media will eventually deteriorate to an unusable degree and FPGA users will be right back to where they started. That is perhaps the singular benefit of going digital for retro emulation. As long as copies are made on new media, they cannot become unusable.
Even someone who never played a video game can see and feel a difference between, say, an Analogue Pocket and some generic SBC inside a Game Boy-esqe chassis. This same person, or you apparantly and me, will not automatically be willing to pay extra for that. It's boutique.
Yeah I don't get it either. I work in aviation and we use fpgas so we can do field upgrades since physical hw changes are not that common in the industry. None of these handhels look like they support fpga image updates. My only guess is that they dont sell enough volume to make ASICs due to economies of scale.
What makes this better than the Analogue Pocket?
It's all about the screen ratio. The Pocket is 10:9, same as the original Game Boy. This way all Game Boy and Game Boy Color games perfectly fit the screen. The Pocket can play GBA, sure, but GBA was 3:2, so it's heavily letterboxed on the Pocket. The Game Bub is a 3:2 screen, while using similar underlying tech of FPGA. Basically, the Game Bub is the right landscape layout and right screen ratio to best play GBA games.
huh, neat.
I can see that being a draw for enough people to own both
Oh for sure. Heck, I have all 3 black Analogue Pockets, and a couple colors of the Chromatic too. I love me some dedicated hardware. But the modded Game Boys just aren't cutting it with their buzzing sound, I want perfected dedicated hardware with backlit screens.
Why not use a Raspberry Pi Zero?
Because that's emulation. This is a FPGA. Like the Analogue Pocket
If the outcome is the exact same, who cares?
This is like golden audio cables but for retro gamers.
The outcome isn't the same; FPGA devices can read the physical carts. And if the core is made well, it can be indistinguishable from OG hardware, though it's not like we don't have some good emus out there as well. For me, it's like asking why anyone buys imported beer when Coors exists. Sometimes I want something that's made to be a higher grade, and FPGA devices tend to be on the higher end. I'm a collector of games and devices, and the last thing I'm looking for is yet another cheap emulation device. Those are a dime a dozen that market is served. Right now, what the market doesn't offer is an FPGA handheld with a 3:2 screen that can read physical GBA carts, and I'd love to get one as soon as someone makes one.
A computer/microcontroller can read physical cards just as well and if the specs of the hardware are well known enough for someone to write vhdl/verilog, they can also write c/rust.
If someone offered you a molecularly identical beer, would you complain that it's not the original.
You just named a bunch of things that don't actually exist in one package that fits in my hand, hardly identical whatsoever. Gimme a call when it is. Or don't, I'm not here to argue semantics of nonexistent things.
Emulation of an ARM console on an ARM computer? And a FPGA is also kind of an emulation but on a lower level, IIRC.
And if the "no emulation" part is about the SM83, the APU or the PPU then maybe just an add-on card for the RPi can work. And cheaper.