this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
866 points (96.5% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

2227 readers
547 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ten four, good buddy.

You know what? I'd have a scrap. Would you have a scrap?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Y'know, a donnybrook, a dust-up...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tolerance is a social contract in which people agree to not give each other shit over perceived differences. To be intolerant is to choose to opt out of that contract, in which case expecting to still enjoy its protections is fucking stupid. Which is to be expected from pedocons and their ilk, who are always acting in bad faith.

[–] elbiter@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

That's right. People must be treated according to how they treat others.

There's nothing more ridiculous and incongruent than a nazi beggin for the love and tolerance they deny to others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a Dane, I'd like to take this opportunity to encourage the pasty prick with the faux Viking shield to crawl back up the wrong hole his mother accidentally shat him out of while giving birth to the good twin.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you. Like Churchill, I'm a firm believer in the fine art of lovingly hand-crafted insults.

And slights, of course - but such delicate subtlety is wasted on Nazis. Then again, oxygen is wasted on Nazis, and they should really cease using any. To be fair to them, given their demonstrated cognitive capabilities, they're evidently already half-way there.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As a Brit, I salute your efforts in keeping the art of insult alive.

Unfortunately, sharp whit is wasted on these evolutionary deadends. The only thing fitting for them is being on the receiving end of "creative" activities that will make the writing hand tremble of the poor Swiss who is now compelled to add several new lines to the Geneva Convention.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago

That's incredibly flattering coming from the foremost modern practitioners of the mighty slight. Especially since I used to live and work in the UK - back when that was still possible, pre-Brexit - and indeed honed my craft on your fair isles.

Well, you know what the Canadian Colonies have to say about it: "It's never a war crime the first time". Or my personal addendum: "As per the Golden Rule, it's never a war crime when you do it to Nazis".

...Or fucking Russians. But I repeat myself.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

Treat others as you want to be treated, let them enjoy their own hospitality.

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think I fall more in the free speech absolutist camp on this one. Look at the UK and how they made saying "Support Palestine Action" a terrorism charge.

I get that it's a group that does protests and sometimes vandalism but imagine in the US if saying "Support Antifa" got you terrorism charges

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences. You can call for the genocide of a minority group all you want. Still a hate crime, and you should face charges because you are a threat to the peace of a healthy society.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Or shot in the neck.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What really must be done is to bring forward serious discussion and not debate through memes

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's been done, got nowhere

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you see how poorly our conversation is set up right now? We are talking below a meme hinting at something and not really bringing up any discussion

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with you. This is a terrible method to conduct political discourse. But of all the times I have discussed things with right wingers, I have only ever left the conversation stupider, and more angry. They simply don't listen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not really hinting at anything, peaceful discourse has been attempted again and again with the right, they literally don't care and won't listen. It doesn't go anywhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love how you frame this as being binary. No time for memes, Captain! We must ride at dawn!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kshade@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Disregarding the rule of law (due process, guilty until proven innocent, ...) is also suicide for society. So maybe banning certain speech is actually a good idea.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago

We have a felon in charge and masked gunmen kidnapping people in the streets. The rule of law left a long time ago dude.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Society makes suicide illegal. Think about it for a second. It's almost like the law is the wrong tool for the job. As if just declaring things banned doesn't do shit.

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Vigilantes beating up the presumed bad people is not a good tool.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Never said it was

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

feel free to speak your mind.

don't complain when you get treated like a piece of shit, when you act like a piece of shit.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No, they still get human rights. Because that's how that works. They are universal. If they believe in them or support them is irrelevant. I don't like it either, but that's literally the foundation of the whole thing.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Human rights don't include the right to be an asshat and kill or call for the death of other people. They can keep their human rights intact while rotting in a prison cell for hate speech and hate crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That's how it should work.
Alas, it doesn't.
I recommend reading https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance#Exact_formulations and considering that in your assessment.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›