this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

560 readers
245 users here now

Europe community on dbzer0. Intended to be a place to discuss European news, politics, or just general topics from a European perspective. Since this is on dbzer0 expect the community to lean more leftist-anarchist but a wide range of views are accepted here (within reason).

Rules:

1. No Bigotry or Hate SpeechAny forms of Homophobia, Transphobia, Queerphobia, Racism, or Ableism will be met with swift and harsh action and will not be tolerated here whatsoever. Bigots will be banned immediately on-sight. This includes apologia of it. Trying to be politely or intellectually bigoted i.e. "Just asking questions" won't be tolerated.

2. No ZionismAny forms of Zionism or Zionist rhetoric will not be tolerated here, this includes Zionist apologia, accusations of antisemitism towards anti-Zionists, or blatant denial or downplaying of the genocide towards Palestinians. Any attempt to uphold or prop up the IHRA definition of antisemitism, will be treated as Zionism. Anyone engaging in Pro-Zionist sentiment or apologia will be actioned in accordance with its severity.

Note: Trying to find loopholes or whataboutery to see what is or isn't genocide denial or Zionism will be treated as a violation of this rule. Don't test us.

3. Stay CivilPlease maintain civil discourse in the community. Do not engage in arguments with others, name-calling, or insults. Note that calling out bigotry or Zionism is not considered an insult. In heated arguments users are encouraged to or even required to disengage failure to do so will result in mod action.

4. No MisinformationSpreading of misinformation intentionally in this community is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Spreading misinformation hurts the credibility of the community and can mislead people sometimes in dangerous ways. Users who intentionally post misinformation as articles, comment answers, or in attempt to win arguments will be actioned swiftly.

Note: This includes Russian and Chinese propaganda. Users with a history of such posting will be banned on sight.

5. No AI ContentPlease do not post articles or content primarily created using generative AI. Generative AI content may contain misinformation or be lower quality and thus is discouraged. Posts and comments featuring it will be removed. However this community does not allow or tolerate Anti-AI trolling or hostility and users who engage in such behavior will be actioned for it, additionally Anti-AI trolling violates Rule 3 and often Rule 4 so it is generally unacceptable already.

Note: Rules 1 & 2 may be subject to preemptive mod action due to their severity, and they apply to a user's entire post history. Not just this community.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com
Sunshine@lemmy.ca
8
European car industry receives subsidies for electric cars, the battle over the end of fossil vehicles in 2035 continues. (www.tijd.be)
submitted 1 week ago by iii@mander.xyz to c/europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary:

The article discusses the European Commission's efforts to accelerate the electrification of the vehicle fleet in Europe, led by President Ursula von der Leyen. She aims to support the production of small, affordable electric cars by the European industry, with a target price of under €20,000. A strategic dialogue has been initiated between the Commission and the automotive industry, highlighting the gap between aspirations and reality, as European automakers face challenges in transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) and are heavily reliant on China for their supply chains.

Von der Leyen has previously delayed stricter emissions regulations to appease automakers and announced a €1.8 billion project to boost battery production. However, concerns remain about Europe's lag behind China in EV adoption. The article notes that the German automotive industry is pushing back against the EU's 2035 deadline for banning new combustion engine vehicles, seeking extensions and more flexible regulations, particularly for hybrid vehicles.

The article concludes that reversing established legislation would be politically risky for the Commission, and ongoing discussions are expected to address the challenges faced by the commercial vehicle sector, which currently has a low market share of electric vans at 8.5%.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iii@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

European car manufacturers have developed a situation of oligopoly through regulatory capture. This has led to a stagnation in innovation, with all 3 companies producing similar vehicles. They justify rising prices by highlighting unnecessary features like lane assist, phone connectivity, larger screens, SUV-style designs, and luxury amenities such as climate control.

In contrast, Asian manufacturers have continued to innovate, offering better vehicles at lower prices. As a result, almost everyone prefers those vehicles. Now European manufacturers have gone cry to mommy and seek assistance from the European Commission.

Apparently, free trade is only beneficial when it behests the established oligarchy. When it shows the EU's industrial and political ineffectiveness, trade barriers are established and subsidies flow, not to those that need and deserve it, but to those that had and squandered.

Here's an alternative: don't reward these zombie companies and self-serving politicians for their mismanagement. Let them face the consequences of their actions and create space for new, innovative entrants.

[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 1 week ago

Asian manufacturers have continued to innovate, offering better vehicles at lower prices

Some Asian manufacturers, particularly those in China, are able to offer lower car prices also due to state subsidies that are far higher than those in Europe, and not in the least to the exploitation of forced labor. There is ample evidence for this, and it is supposedly a major reason why China is opposing transparent supply chain laws.

Free trade is only beneficial when it behests the established oligarchy. When it shows the EU’s industrial and political ineffectiveness, trade barriers are established and subsidies flow

The EU has established some trade barriers against some imports from China only recently and to protect its industries from just the high Chinese subsidies mentioned above. However, even these new EU measures are literally nothing compared to the protectionist measures applied by China to shield its domestic markets from European and other foreign competition. If European companies want to run a subsidiary in China, for example, they need a Chinese partner company to form a joint venture, and the Chinese partner would then own the majority of the company; and this is just one example of Chinese protectionism. If it's he case, it isn't Europe but China - where wealth concentration and inequality is higher than in the EU - that considers "free trade only beneficial when it behests the established oligarchy".

Here’s an alternative: don’t reward these zombie companies and self-serving politicians for their mismanagement. Let them face the consequences of their actions and create space for new, innovative entrants.

If BYD & Co wouldn't benefit from Chinese subsidies and their government's protection, the situation for Chinese carmakers would be more dire than it already is. We have seen many Chinese car manufacturers going bankrupt or halting production despite huge government support, and even China's EV champion BYD openly said of late that the EV price war in China's home market is 'not sustainable' (yet it still slashes prices),