this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
467 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Posts

83 readers
316 users here now

Shareworthy Microblogs.

Blacklisted websites:

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
467
ICYM (i.imgur.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Pro@reddthat.com to c/micro@reddthat.com
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We are also at the point where they want to label anyone they disagree a terrorist. They’ve already openly stated they want to label transgender people as terrorists.

I’ll let you put 2 and 2 together

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh and they also floated the idea of mass murdering homeless people and people with disabilities

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I know of a country a few years ago that did that with traveling vans, I'm not great with recent history but I'm sure it worked out fine and didn't end in several million deaths.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Oh don't forget the call today to enact a special cold war rule that would allow the government to censor media at will.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please read H.R. 5300, SEC. 226. NO PASSPORTS FOR TERRORISTS AND TRAFFICKERS

https://midwest.social/post/35310527

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Somehow that doesn't sound that shocking, given that ever since 2001, they can just ban someone from flying. They revoked Snowden's passport and that's why he got stuck in russia. This is already reality.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think you understand that this is an amendment to the Passport Act of 1926. So yeah the US could revoke passports before this.

What is new is that now your passport can be revoked purely on the whims of Marco Rubio. And they can accuse you of being a terrorist for aiding any group that they decide to arbitrarily call a terrorist organization.

Please read the amendment

[–] SnekZone@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Now the Big Border Walls will be built to lock us in.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So they hate us but also want to lock us in?

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, our only value is as labor

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Like how is this even possible it's clearly violating the first amendment.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Reminder that they revoked Snowden's passport, they can already do that.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So you want them in the country then?

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The idea is they claim people with dissenting ideologies are terrorists, then revoke their passport. Therefore the logical conclusion is that you want terrorists to be stuck the country.

Terrorism is a nonsense term term made up to justify murder based on the whims of power.

Just another small step into fascism but this would be a pretty big one towards the development of a genocide.

[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Easier to round up in camps, and a vocal diaspora can be troubling

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It implies they're afraid of twinks.