this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
95 points (99.0% liked)

News

32373 readers
5388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NEW YORK (AP) — Three months after his release from an immigration jail, Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil is facing the growing threat of deportation for his role in campus protests against Israel.

In court documents made public Wednesday, an immigration judge in Louisiana ruled that Khalil should be deported for failing to disclose information on his green card application.

The decision marked a setback for Khalil, a lawful U.S. resident and recent Columbia University graduate student who became the first person targeted by President Donald Trump’s aggressive crackdown on pro-Palestinian activists. But while the ruling puts him one step closer to a final order of removal, it is far from the last word in the case.

For now, Khalil remains protected from detention and deportation under a separate judicial order. His legal team has said they intend to appeal the immigration judge’s ruling, which Khalil has characterized as “further evidence of retaliation” from a “kangaroo court.”

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago

Reminder immigration judges are not real judges

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So, what is the information he failed to disclose? That’s kind of an important detail.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Several paragraphs in to this article,

Comans then sided with the government on a separate claim, finding that Khalil had “willfully misrepresented” facts about his background on his green card application, including his role in a United Nations agency that provides services to Palestinian refugees.

Khalil has maintained that any omissions on the application were unintentional.

Also (I'm heavily paraphrasing but this is more or less from the article too) the judge's response to "doesn't it seem totally insane to call working for the UN a deportable offense?" is "I don't make foreign policy decisions, that's the presidents job and he cannot be questioned"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and he cannot be questioned

Literally judicial malpractice.

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Immigration judges aren't actual judges. They are in the executive branch.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Did I stutter?

The entire core concept is judicial malpractice!

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com -1 points 3 days ago

An important detail... that is in the article.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The system never cared that he was wrongfully detained and deported. They only cared that proper procedure wasn't followed while committing crimed against humanity. In short, they simply wanted the time and space to wave symbols of their power around before letting the fascist do whatever he wants. In this political climate, when two judges give conflicting orders, whose do you think is going to end up being enforced?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Being this cynical is uncalled for and doesn't help anything. Most judges (not this one) care about following laws.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

There is usually no judge around when people get detained.