Because it's not shiny and new? I think the simple stuff works great with the shiny stuff. Command line tools are great for weaving in NTFY pings to our fancy pocket communicators with all kinds of information.
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
550 points (97.1% liked)
Selfhosted
52161 readers
761 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why videos? I feel like an old man yelling at clouds every time something that sounds interesting is presented in a fucking video. Videos are so damn awful. They take time, I need audio and I can't copy&paste. Why have they become the default for things that should've been a blog post?
Thank you for putting into words what ive subconsciously been thinking for years. Every search result prioritizes videos at the top and I'm still annoyed every time. Or even worst I have to hunt through a 10 minute video for the 30 seconds of info I needed. Stoohhhhpppp internet of new! Make it good again!
Ad money.
Blogs can have ads.
Hear hear. Knowledge should be communicated in an easily shareable way that can also be archived as easily, in contrast to a video requiring hundreds of MB:s.
Especially for a command line tool
man rsync
I never thought of it as slow. More like very reliable. I dont need my data to move fast, I need it to be copied with 100% reliability.
And not waste time copying duplicate data. And for the typical home user, it's probably mo slower than other options.
Surely restic or borg would be better for backups?
Rsync can send files and not delete stuff, but there's no versioning or retention settings.
Duplicity also works really well for backups and you can encrypt them with your own openpgp key.
If you add --delete-before, it absolutely can delete stuff.
Yeah but then it's not really a good backup!
For versioning/retention, just use snapshots in whatever filesystem you're using (you are using a proper filesystem like ZFS or BTRFS, right?).
How does that get sent over rsync though? Wouldn't you need snapshots on the remote destination server?
Why not just use a backup utility instead?
Yes, async copies files to the remote server, the remote server takes regular snapshots.
Why not just use a backup utility instead?
What is that utility providing that snapshots + rsync doesn't. If rsync + snapshots is sufficient, why overcomplicate it with a backup utility?
The main things that come to mind are you have to test/monitor 2 seperate actions instead of 1, and restores of single files could be more difficult since you need to login to the backup server, restore the file from a snapshot, then also copy that file back to your PC.
My point is, how often do you actually need to restore from backup? If it's frequent, consider a dedicated tool for whatever that thing is. If it's infrequent, it'll probably easier to just learn how to do it every five years or whatever.
If you like borg/restic/etc, by all means, use it.
My point is that most people probably don't need it. Snapshots are something you set up once, and you should probably use them even if you're using something like borg for any files that aren't covered (e.g. config files on the server). Rsync is also something you set up once, and checking it is the same as any other service.
It's not bad if you don't need historical backups. I kinda think I do, so I use https://github.com/rustic-rs/rustic becase rust
Restic (https://github.com/restic/restic) is probably a better choice if you're not a rust-freak like me.
Rustic scares me. I will 100% forget what tool I used to backup after 5 years and be unable to recover my files.
I use rsync + ZFS for backups which includes historical backups
Yup, just configure a snapshot policy and you can recover deleted and modified files going back as long as you choose. And it is probably more space efficient than both/restic too.
I tried to use it via tailscale but it disconnects very easily - is to be expected?
I would not expect rsync to have frequent disconnects, no.
If I connect to the same server via my own VPN I don't have the disconnections, so I'm thinking it's tailscale cutting connections after too much traffic. But connecting via tailscale is so much more convenient 😢
But if you're working with Linux you're going to need to know it.
Nope. I never have needed to know it. I only ever used it because I was either curious to know how to use it or because it was more convenient than other solutions. But scp is basically just as convenient.
It doesn't do diffs, so it's really bad if there's a lot of duplicate data.
If you want to use it for backups, there are other solutions, so you still don't need to use it or know it. You can use something else. That's my only point. 🤷♂️
And "really bad" is all relative. If you are only backing up your home drive with documents or whatever, copying a few unnecessary gigabytes over a LAN connection isn't too bad at all. But scp isn't what you should be using for backups anyway. I only used rsync for file transfer...
I use rsync for all kinda of things:
- deploying static files to a public webserver (blog or whatever)
- backups - scheduled systems/cron task w/ SSH key
- copying stuff from a USB drive
I only really use scp if the system doesn't already have rsync.
Alright. But you don't need to know rsync. That's my only point. 👍👍
Sure, but you should probably be aware of what it is and what it does. It's incredibly common and will be referenced in a ton of documentation for Linux server stuff.
You won't need to unless you run a server in that case. 👍 But the only condition here was "working with Linux".
Like I said, I've been using Linux at home and for work for over a decade, maybe 15+ years, never once did I need to use rsync or know what it is.
That being said, it was convenient when I used it, but never did I need it.
This is the self-hosted community, so that's the context I was assuming.
I would generally argue that rsync is not a backup solution. But it is one of the best transfer/archiving solutions.
Yes, it is INCREDIBLY powerful and is often 90% of what people actually want/need. But to be an actual backup solution you still need infrastructure around that. Bare minimum is a crontab. But if you are actually backing something up (not just copying it to a local directory) then you need some logging/retry logic on top of that.
At which point you are building your own borg, as it were. Which, to be clear, is a great thing to do. But... backups are incredibly important and it is very much important to understand what a backup actually needs to be.
I would generally argue that rsync is not a backup solution.
Yeah, if you want to use rsync specifically for backups, you're probably better-off using something like rdiff-backup, which makes use of rsync to generate backups and store them efficiently, and drive it from something like backupninja, which will run the task periodically and notify you if it fails.
rsync: one-way synchronization
unison: bidirectional synchronization
git: synchronization of text files with good interactive merging.
rdiff-backup: rsync-based backups. I used to use this and moved to restic, as the backupninja target for rdiff-backup has kind of fallen into disrepair.
That doesn't mean "don't use rsync". I mean, rsync's a fine tool. It's just...not really a backup program on its own.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Ive personally used rsync for backups for about....15 years or so? Its worked out great. An awesome video going over all the basics and what you can do with it.
And I generally enjoy Veronica's presentation. Knowledgable and simple.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
Rsnapshot. It uses rsync, but provides snapshot management and multiple backup versioning.
load more comments
(5 replies)
view more: next ›