this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

Art & Design

445 readers
13 users here now

🇬🇧 This is a bilingual community on a french instance.

Total subscribers:

🇬🇧 Let's discuss art and design!

Join us and

This community is about art in all its form, as well as its influence on culture and its application at the service of society: architecture, music, literature, performances, video games, graphic design...

Check the pinned posts for basic rules and a (wip) list of art related communities 🔗

🇫🇷 Discutons d'art et de design !

Vous pouvez ici :

Le sujet de la communauté concerne toutes les formes d'art, ainsi que leur influence sur la culture et leur application au service de la société : architecture, musique, littérature, performances, jeux vidéos, design graphique...

Pour toute question, suggestion, réclamation, etc. N'hésitez pas à utiliser le sujet épinglé.

✅ Les règles de l'instance s'appliquent bien évidemment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you hold the diagram backwards, it looks like a steady evolution from a muddy and nearly indistinguishable set of random blobs and into a set of strong, minimal designs that scan instantly and are easily distinct and clear.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least it's not google's product logo differentiation failure.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's pretty competitive with it TBH. I guess Google is probably worse just because of deliberately choosing exactly the same general visual appearance for literally every single logo for some reason. This one at least has different colors, for some of them.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think the 2013 set was probably peak UX, common design language, quick at a glance differentiation via colors, a giant letter, and a logo to convey functionality.

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

After 2003, the only set I liked was 2018. Even the current iteration looks like a bad evolution.

[–] cnovel@jlai.lu 7 points 1 week ago

2013 is my fav: clear distinction (both letter and color) while holding significance. Using 2013 icons, you could guess what each software does, even if you are not familiar with them.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, teams has reached its final form.. msn messenger.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

2007-2013 feel like the best designs. The icons are both unique and somewhat descriptive of what the application does.

It seems like Microsoft feels like their applications are so ubiquitous that they don't need to be user friendly, but still seems like bad design.