this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
509 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25961 readers
2435 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) sent a letter to the nonprofit operator of Wikipedia alleging a pattern of liberal bias in articles on the collaborative encyclopedia.

"I write to request information about ideological bias on the Wikipedia platform and at the Wikimedia Foundation," Cruz wrote to Wikimedia Foundation CEO Maryana Iskander in a letter dated October 3. "Wikipedia began with a noble concept: crowdsource human knowledge using verifiable sources and make it free to the public. That's what makes reports of Wikipedia's systemic bias especially troubling."

Citing research from the conservative Manhattan Institute, Cruz wrote that "researchers have found that articles on the site often reflect a left-wing bias." Cruz alleged that "bias is particularly evident in Wikipedia's reliable sources/perennial sources list" because it describes "MSNBC and CNN as 'generally reliable' sources, while listing Fox News as a 'generally unreliable' source for politics and science. The left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center gets a top rating, but the Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative think tank, is a 'blacklisted' and 'deprecated' source that Wikipedia's editors have determined 'promotes disinformation.'"

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Apparently things like truth and reality are left wing now. Good luck with that, psychotic ultra right wingers.

Raffy buddy we keep trying to Tell you reality has a left leaning bias. Maybe you'd hear it if you were ever in the states when your constituents are trying to talk to you.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

They relay objective information, so yes of course they do

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

These people are such little babies. The whole reason Conservapedia exists is because they had a meltdown over using CE and BCE for dates. You know, as is the standard. But little whiny conservatives need to have their little book club centered at all times.

Repeat after me, Die Mad About It. The sooner the better.

[–] sudo_shinespark@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is there a way to just download a straight copy of Wikipedia?

Def not asking because I expect every possible thing to go awry and we end up with Big Brother’s version of wiki

[–] karashta@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

https://kiwix.org/en/applications/

Kiwix is an offline browser for wikis.

There's a library they have as well. I have a snapshot of Wikipedia from 2024 before the fascists took over. Also grabbed a couple others.

I think it was like 120GB for all of Wikipedia with pictures.

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Excellent work. Share, copy, mail clusters of sd drives to all corners of the earth.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] karashta@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the share!

[–] sudo_shinespark@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neat. I will be maybe be dedicating a TB of storage to this for no particular reason

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This seems like the perfect usecase for torrents. Is there an official torrent?

Edit: Nvm, found it.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Data_dump_torrents#English_Wikipedia

About 25GB compressed

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I know Wikipedia is localized for many languages; I’ve never heard of a Straight Wikipedia though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

“Systemic issues are real when they affect the conservative agenda, and DEI is good when it requires including conservative propaganda.” Got it.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Snowflakes that can't deal with their own emotions. You can't rewrite reality by edict. Go back in time if you want to fix yourself. You can't undo the harm you've caused to all of us. Best thing to do is to stop causing harm.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, the truth often has a left-leaning bias. If right-wingers aren't ok with that, they need to demand better from their sources.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Dear sir or madam. I hope the day finds you well. I'm writing to let you know:

  1. You are how you are
  2. I don't like it
  3. as a private entity, you are well within your rights to tell me to fuck right off
  4. in which case I will cry and rub my hurting bottom

Thank you for your attention to this matter."

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What a chode

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›