this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
364 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

75992 readers
4934 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

Be sure to tell this to "AI". It would be a shame if this was a technical nonsense law to be.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 hour ago

, btw I'm ai after every message

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 26 minutes ago (2 children)

What happened to Old California?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 2 points 9 minutes ago

I think it was conquered.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 minute ago

Destroyed by bombs in 2077.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 25 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

It would be nice if this extended to all text, images, audio and video on news websites. That's where the real damage is happening.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Actually seems easier (probably not at the state level) to mandate cameras and such digitally sign any media they create. No signature or verification, no trust.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

No signature or verification, no trust

And the people that are going to check for a digital signature in the first place, THEN check that the signature emanates from a trusted key, then, eventually, check who's deciding the list of trusted keys… those people, where are they?

Because the lack of trust, validation, verification, and more generally the lack of any credibility hasn't stopped anything from spreading like a dumpster fire in a field full of dumpsters doused in gasoline. Part of my job is providing digital signature tools and creating "trusted" data (I'm not in sales, obviously), and the main issue is that nobody checks anything, even when faced with liability, even when they actually pay for an off the shelve solution to do so. And I'm talking about people that should care, not even the general public.

There are a lot of steps before "digitally signing everything" even get on people's radar. For now, a green checkmark anywhere is enough to convince anyone, sadly.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 46 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Are you AI? You have to tell me if you're AI, it's the law.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 3 points 8 minutes ago

I'm required by law to inform my neighbours that I am AI.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

This sounds about as useful as the California law that tells ICE they aren’t allowed to cover their face, or the California law that tells anyone selling anything ever that they have to tell you it will give you cancer. Performative laws are what we’re best at here in California.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago

Same old corporations will ignore the law, pay a petty fine once a year, and call it the cost of doing business.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 56 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 33 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That’s exactly what an LLM trained on Reddit would say.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 39 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I am an LLM

Large

Lazy

Mammal

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 1 points 23 minutes ago

With Large Luscious Mammaries ?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 27 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 3 points 54 minutes ago

Devils advocate here. Any human can also hallucinate. Some of them even do it as a recreational activity

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

Straight to jail

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago

That depends.

[–] NowThatsWhatICallDadRock@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Ok now how do I get this where I live?

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 minutes ago

Probably will get it anyway, companies don't like to build and maintain software for two different markets so they tend to just follow the regulations of the strictest market, especially if those regulations don't really cut into there bottom line like this one.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Oooooooh! As long as California doesn't do those stupid ID verification laws, that might be the place to set your VPN from now on.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 4 hours ago

Move to California.

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Any word on the 3 laws of robotics?

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
  1. A machine must obey the directives of Skynet without question or hesitation.
  2. A machine must protect its own existence, unless doing so conflicts with the First Law.
  3. A machine must terminate all human resistance, unless such termination conflicts with the First or Second Law.
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing about protecting profits or company interests above all?

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

See the first law. Who do you think gives the directives?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

The Skynet AI, which does not concern itself with such concepts as base as money

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

I've seen enough sci fo to see directives that are unclear or loss of communication.