120
submitted 11 months ago by admin@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 22 points 11 months ago

This is a slippery slope towards mandatory abortions for all pregnant women

[-] DreadPirateShawn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 months ago

No. The court is ordering the state to allow the necessary medical procedure, NOT mandating to the pregnant woman that she must have an abortion. You either need to read the article more closely, or stop changing the words into different meanings, whichever is relevant.

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 27 points 11 months ago

They are clearly satirizing the arguments conservatives make about allowing abortions.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago

I think there was a hidden /s in there. Or at least I hope.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago

Unless the OC says anything, I'm not assuming there was any sarcasm. I knew too many people back home who honestly believed such things.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago

As long as the fetus is baptized so it's soul may enter the Kingdom Of Heaven then mandatory abortions guarantee salvation inshallah 🙏

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

It also means less cannon fodder for the quiverfull cultists.

[-] DreadPirateShawn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

...fair enough. :-| Didn't read it that way but I can see it.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

It's all part of the demonrats plan to replace the white people with Muslims from Mexico

[-] NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

No no no this is just a cover to be used when the 5G vaccines activate and start causing mass preborn child deaths. These good god fearing women are part of the silent majority and would never actually want an abortion, this is the deep state's doing!

Oh and something something Jewish space lasers too

[-] autotldr 6 points 11 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryThe decision marks a significant development in the ongoing debate over the state’s medical exception to its controversial ban on abortions after six weeks – one of the strictest in the nation.

Her lawsuit is believed to be one of the first attempts in the country by an individual seeking a court-ordered abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, according to the New York Times.

She has had two prior cesarean surgeries – C-sections – and, the suit said, “continuing the pregnancy puts her at high risk for severe complications threatening her life and future fertility, including uterine rupture and hysterectomy.”

“The idea that Mrs. Cox wants desperately to be a parent, and this law might actually cause her to lose that ability is shocking and would be a genuine miscarriage of justice,” Judge Maya Guerra Gamble said.

A lawyer representing Texas argued Thursday that Cox’s pregnancy symptoms did not meet the standard set out by the state for a medical emergency that would allow for an abortion.

The argument over subjective versus objective medical reasons for an abortion is central to the ongoing debate and legal fights regarding the state’s exception rule.


Saved 81% of original text.

[-] soupcat@sopuli.xyz 21 points 11 months ago

Judge really couldn't find a better phrase than 'miscarriage of justice'

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
120 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2241 readers
22 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS