this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
17 points (74.3% liked)

Science

16284 readers
83 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I rolled my eyes until I saw where this was published. Huh, that's interesting. I'm way too uneducated to know what this means, but maybe the science peeps I follow will post some vids in the coming weeks.

[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The headline on this should be that the theory is actually testable.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah, of what I could follow, that was the most interesting part. In addition to the history lesson of the beef between scientists!

[–] sharkfucker420@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is it testable? This is fucking huge if true

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

Sounds like it should be, and it would have to produce results that line up with experiments at least as well as the standard model.