129
This is why we can't have nice things
Based on the ‘Pubs I know, I have no difficulty believing that at least 24% of them are this fucking stupid. It’s kind of their defining characteristic.
I think it's that combined with a complete aversion to accountability. The last thing horrible people want is to be held accountable for their behaviour.
So, 25% of 19% of the US population.
Or, just over 15M people out of 332M are saying this.
Or, to put it another way: 317M people are not saying this.
Or to put it another way: VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION, EVERY TIME IF YOU WANT THE WORLD TO GET BETTER
Edit: because it was pointed out I wrote B instead of M. - Thanks!
I appreciate you putting that context on it, but it's millions, not billiions.
Dang my typo. I've edited it. Thanks!
A quarter of the population have zero understanding of the law so that tracks.
A quarter of a third.
If they don't prosecute him, then he's innocent.
If they prosecute him, then it's a corrupt DOJ.
Pretty much this.
Fantastic! Split that minority vote even more! I love it when the trash takes itself out!
Thanks to these braindead individuals having an ideology even slightly to the right is now viewed as dangerous and retarded.
And I get why...
Mostly because being slightly to the right in the US is too far right to reasonable people, and is indeed dangerous and retarded.
And if he becomes the nominee, he will be supported by 100% of gop voters
But, y'know, "party of the Constitution" or some bullshit.
Cultists. Absolute. Fucking. Cultists.
Its treason weasels all the way down. Ugh.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
129 points (94.5% liked)
politics
18883 readers
6049 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS